Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Chunhui [1 ]
Da Silva, Angela J. [2 ]
Liang, Jieming [1 ]
Wohlers, Christopher [1 ]
Huntzinger, Cal [2 ]
Neylon, John P. [1 ]
Du, Dongsu [1 ]
Wong, Jeffrey Y. C. [1 ]
Liu, An [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1500 Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] RefleXion Med Inc, Hayward, CA USA
关键词
Head and neck cancer; biology-guided radiotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; FEASIBILITY; XEROSTOMIA; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2020.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to compare prototype treatment plans for a new biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine in its intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) mode with those using existing IMRT delivery techniques in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively selected ten previous NPC patients treated in 33 fractions according to the NRG-HN001 treatment protocol. Three treatment plans were generated for each patient: a helical tomotherapy (HT) plan with a 2.5-cm jaw, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan using 2 to 4 6-MV arc fields, and a prototype IMRT plan for a new BgRT system which uses a 6-MV photon beam on a ring gantry that rotates at 60 rotations per minute with a couch that moves in small incremental steps. Treatment plans were compared using dosimetric parameters to planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) as specified by the NRG-HN001 protocol. Plans for the three modalities had comparable dose coverage, mean dose, and dose heterogeneity to the primary PTV, while the prototype IMRT plans had greater dose heterogeneity to the non-primary PTVs, with the average homogeneity index ranging from 1.28 to 1.50 in the prototype plans. Six of all the 7 OAR mean dose parameters were lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans compared to the HT and VMAT plans with the other mean dose parameter being comparable, and all the 18 OAR maximum dose parameters were comparable or lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans. The average left and right parotid mean doses in the prototype plans were 10.5 Gy and 10.4 Gy lower than those in the HT plans, respectively, and were 5.1 Gy and 5.2 Gy lower than those in the VMAT plans, respectively. Compared to that with the HT and VMAT plans, the treatment time was longer with statistical significance with the prototype IMRT plans. Based on dosimetric comparison of ten NPC cases, the prototype IMRT plans achieved comparable or better critical organ sparing compared to the HT and VMAT plans for definitive NPC radiotherapy. However, there was higher dose heterogeneity to non-primary targets and longer estimated treatment time with the prototype plans. (c)& nbsp;2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical treatment considerations in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era for parotid lymph node metastasis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lin, Chao
    Lu, Nian
    Liang, Jiong-Lin
    Guo, Jia
    Gu, Li-Wen
    Sun, Rui
    Guo, Ling
    Yang, Qi
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186
  • [42] Metabolic tumor volume and conformal radiotherapy based on prognostic PET/CT for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Fei, Zhaodong
    Chen, Chuanben
    Huang, Yingying
    Qiu, Xiufang
    Li, Yi
    Li, Li
    Chen, Taojun
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (28)
  • [43] A plan comparison study between rapid arc and conventional intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
    Patidar, Yaman
    Kumar, H. S.
    Sharma, Neeti
    Mayilvaganan, Athiyaman
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (03) : 543 - 547
  • [44] Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor
    Watcharawipha, Anirut
    Chakrabandhu, Somvilai
    Kongsa, Anupong
    Tippanya, Damrongsak
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (07):
  • [45] A study of planning dose constraints for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using a commercial inverse treatment planning system
    Xia, P
    Lee, N
    Liu, YM
    Poon, I
    Weinberg, V
    Shin, E
    Quivey, JM
    Verhey, LJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03): : 886 - 896
  • [46] Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: The Hong Kong experience
    Kam, MKM
    Teo, PML
    Chau, RMC
    Cheung, KY
    Choi, PHK
    Kwan, WH
    Leung, SF
    Zee, B
    Chan, ATC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1440 - 1450
  • [47] Salvage Treatment for Isolated Regional Failure of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Primary Radiotherapy
    Lo, Wu-Chia
    Wang, Cheng-Ping
    Ko, Jeng-Yuh
    Lou, Pei-Jen
    Yang, Tsung-Lin
    Wang, Chun-Wei
    Hu, Ya-Ling
    Chen, Tseng-Cheng
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) : 1001 - 1008
  • [48] Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Xia, P
    Fu, KK
    Wong, GW
    Akazawa, C
    Verhey, LJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02): : 329 - 337
  • [49] Comparisons of quality of life for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after treatment with different RT technologies
    Jang-Chun, L.
    Jing-Min, H.
    Yee-Min, J.
    Dai-Wei, L.
    Chang-Ming, C.
    Chun-Shu, L.
    Wen-Yen, H.
    Yu-Fu, S.
    Kuen-Tze, L.
    Chao-Yueh, F.
    Cheng-Hsiang, L.
    Hsing-Lung, C.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2014, 34 (04) : 241 - 246
  • [50] Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy
    Ding, Zhen
    Xiang, Xiaoyong
    Zeng, Qi
    Ma, Jun
    Dai, Zhitao
    Kang, Kailian
    Bi, Suyan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)