Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Chunhui [1 ]
Da Silva, Angela J. [2 ]
Liang, Jieming [1 ]
Wohlers, Christopher [1 ]
Huntzinger, Cal [2 ]
Neylon, John P. [1 ]
Du, Dongsu [1 ]
Wong, Jeffrey Y. C. [1 ]
Liu, An [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1500 Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] RefleXion Med Inc, Hayward, CA USA
关键词
Head and neck cancer; biology-guided radiotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; FEASIBILITY; XEROSTOMIA; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2020.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to compare prototype treatment plans for a new biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine in its intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) mode with those using existing IMRT delivery techniques in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively selected ten previous NPC patients treated in 33 fractions according to the NRG-HN001 treatment protocol. Three treatment plans were generated for each patient: a helical tomotherapy (HT) plan with a 2.5-cm jaw, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan using 2 to 4 6-MV arc fields, and a prototype IMRT plan for a new BgRT system which uses a 6-MV photon beam on a ring gantry that rotates at 60 rotations per minute with a couch that moves in small incremental steps. Treatment plans were compared using dosimetric parameters to planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) as specified by the NRG-HN001 protocol. Plans for the three modalities had comparable dose coverage, mean dose, and dose heterogeneity to the primary PTV, while the prototype IMRT plans had greater dose heterogeneity to the non-primary PTVs, with the average homogeneity index ranging from 1.28 to 1.50 in the prototype plans. Six of all the 7 OAR mean dose parameters were lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans compared to the HT and VMAT plans with the other mean dose parameter being comparable, and all the 18 OAR maximum dose parameters were comparable or lower with statistical significance in the prototype plans. The average left and right parotid mean doses in the prototype plans were 10.5 Gy and 10.4 Gy lower than those in the HT plans, respectively, and were 5.1 Gy and 5.2 Gy lower than those in the VMAT plans, respectively. Compared to that with the HT and VMAT plans, the treatment time was longer with statistical significance with the prototype IMRT plans. Based on dosimetric comparison of ten NPC cases, the prototype IMRT plans achieved comparable or better critical organ sparing compared to the HT and VMAT plans for definitive NPC radiotherapy. However, there was higher dose heterogeneity to non-primary targets and longer estimated treatment time with the prototype plans. (c)& nbsp;2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy An Evolving Treatment Paradigm
    Ladbury, Colton
    Eustace, Nicholas
    Amini, Arya
    Dandapani, Savita
    Williams, Terence
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 32 (03) : 553 - 568
  • [2] A longitudinal evaluation of improvements in radiotherapy treatment plan quality for head and neck cancer patients
    Tol, Jim P.
    Doornaert, Patricia
    Witte, Birgit I.
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 (02) : 337 - 343
  • [3] Analysis of Quality of Life Outcome for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients After Treatment
    Jakob, M.
    Manz, M.
    Schroeck, A.
    Bootz, F.
    Eichhorn, K.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2013, 92 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [4] A comparative study of RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan quality for cervical cancer treatment
    Atiq, Atia
    Atiq, Maria
    Iqbal, Khalid
    Sial, Manzar A.
    Altaf, Saima
    Shamsi, Quratul Ain
    Buzdar, Saeed A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 55 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [5] Monitoring of PET-Avid OAR Moving in the Treatment Area During Biology-guided Radiotherapy Delivery
    Surucu, Murat
    Han, Bin
    Bal, Harshali
    Shi, Linxi
    Xu, Shiyu
    Voronenko, Yevgen
    Bal, Girish
    Schmall, Jeffrey
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4408 - S4409
  • [6] Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time
    Wild, Esther
    Bangert, Mark
    Nill, Simeon
    Oelfke, Uwe
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (05) : 2157 - 2168
  • [7] IMRT with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Plan Evaluation and Treatment Outcome
    Kim, Jun Won
    Cho, Jae Ho
    Keum, Ki Chang
    Kim, Joo Ho
    Kim, Gwi Eon
    Lee, Jong Young
    Kim, Soo Kon
    Lee, Chang Geol
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (12) : 1152 - 1160
  • [8] Incidence of late-onset pneumonia in patients after treatment with radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A nationwide population-based study
    Yen, Ting-Ting
    Lin, Ching-Heng
    Jiang, Rong-San
    Shih, Yi-Ting
    Yen, Hung-Rong
    Liang, Kai-Li
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (12): : 1756 - 1761
  • [9] Various cost functions evaluation of commercial biologically based treatment planning system for nasopharyngeal cancer
    Can, Sumeyra
    Ozer, Elif Eda
    Karacetin, Didem
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [10] Evidence on effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 2-dimensional radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Meta-analysis and a systematic review of the literature
    Co, Jayson
    Benedict Mejia, Michael
    Margarita Dizon, Janine
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 : E2130 - E2142