Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Compensation for Changes in Urban Water Customer Service Standards

被引:46
|
作者
MacDonald, Darla Hatton [1 ]
Morrison, Mark D. [2 ]
Barnes, Mary B. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Urrbrae, Australia
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Business, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia
关键词
Choice modelling; Price of water; Urban water; Willingness to accept compensation; Willingness to pay; CHOICE; QUALITY; PREFERENCE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-010-9599-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore the use of choice modelling for obtaining implicit prices for attributes associated with changes in the reliability of household water services. While not often estimated in practice, the collection of information about willingness to accept compensation is relevant for utilities as customers often have implicit or explicit property rights for particular levels of customer service. Given ageing infrastructure in many cities, maintaining customer service standards requires large capital expenditures. It may be more economically efficient to allow standards to decline in some areas and compensate consumers. Therefore it is useful to understand the value of attributes of water service provision using willingness to accept and how this differs from willingness to pay. We therefore estimate both willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures, and find that respondents value a larger range of attributes using the willingness to accept approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3145 / 3158
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Working Out the Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Gap Using Economics, Psychology, and Happiness Approaches to Valuation
    Beja, Edsel L., Jr.
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2014, 9 (04) : 819 - 829
  • [42] Working Out the Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Gap Using Economics, Psychology, and Happiness Approaches to Valuation
    Edsel L. Beja
    Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2014, 9 : 819 - 829
  • [43] The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach
    Amigues, JP
    Boulatoff, C
    Desaigues, B
    Gauthier, C
    Keith, JE
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [44] Reference-dependent valuations of risk: Why willingness-to-accept exceeds willingness-to-pay
    Viscusi, W. Kip
    Huber, Joel
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2012, 44 (01) : 19 - 44
  • [45] Willingness to pay and willingness to work for improvements of municipal and community-managed water services
    Vasquez, William F.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (10) : 8002 - 8014
  • [46] Herders' willingness to accept versus the public sector's willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China
    Zhen, L.
    Li, F.
    Yan, H. M.
    Liu, G. H.
    Liu, J. Y.
    Zhang, H. Y.
    Du, B. Z.
    Wu, R. Z.
    Sun, C. Z.
    Wang, C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [47] Awareness of coping costs and willingness to pay for urban drinking water service: Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan
    Hasan, Syed M.
    Akram, Agha Ali
    Jeuland, Marc
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 71
  • [48] The willingness to pay for in-house piped water in urban and rural Indonesia
    Suparman, Yusep
    Folmer, Henk
    Oud, Johan H. L.
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (02) : 407 - U480
  • [49] Using Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept to Value Farmland Preservation under Ambiguous Property Rights and Preference Uncertainty
    Luo, Yicong
    Swallow, Brent M.
    Adamowicz, Wiktor L.
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (04) : 606 - 607
  • [50] The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care
    van den Berg, B
    Bleichrodt, H
    Eeckhoudt, L
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (04) : 363 - 376