The doctor will see you now: Eye gaze, conversation and patient engagement in the surgical outpatient clinic. An Australian observational cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
Ting, Ying Yang [1 ]
Reid, Jessica L. [1 ]
Treloar, Ellie [1 ]
Lee, Wei Shan Bobby [1 ]
Tee, Jeeng Yeeng [1 ]
Cong, Wen Jing Phoebe [1 ]
Peng, Dangyi [2 ]
Edwards, Suzanne [3 ]
Ey, Jesse [1 ]
Edwardes, Nicholas [1 ]
Granchi, Nelson [1 ]
Maddern, Guy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Discipline Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Monash Sch Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Adelaide Hlth Technol Assessment, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
mutual eye gaze; patient engagement; surgical outpatient; DECISION-MAKING; COMMUNICATION; COMPANIONS; FAMILY; CARE; INVOLVEMENT; CONTEXT; VISITS;
D O I
10.1111/ans.17163
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundResults Surgical outpatient consultations are demanding for the surgeon and patients without a definite formula for success. Various factors have been identified regarding factors that influence patient satisfaction and engagement. We aimed to examine the modern-day surgical outpatient consultation and report on these factors. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was performed by reviewing video recordings of 182 surgical consultations by 12 surgeons at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, South Australia, Australia. The mean consultation time was 12.3 min, with pre-surgical consultations being the longest. There were 107 consultations for benign conditions (58%). Proportionally, the consultant spoke most (51.9% of total consultation time), followed by the patient (19.5%) and then companion (8.2%). Forty-eight (26.4%) patients brought a companion to the clinic but monopolisation of the consultation by the companion was rare. When a companion was present, there was more mutual eye gaze between the consultant and the patient. Interruptions were present in 23.6% of consultations and were associated with a significant increase of the length of the consultation. Table positioning did not seem to affect the dynamics of the outpatient consultation. Conclusion Companions are highly valuable for promoting patient engagement and their presence should be encouraged in surgical outpatients. Interruptions should be kept to a minimum to avoid unnecessary delays. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the effect of companions, interruptions and table positioning during a consultation on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2376 / 2381
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Andrades Marie, 2013, J Family Med Prim Care, V2, P283, DOI 10.4103/2249-4863.120767
[2]  
Anteneh Asefa Anteneh Asefa, 2014, Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, V6, P101
[3]   Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review [J].
Batbaatar, Enkhjargal ;
Dorjdagva, Javkhlanbayar ;
Luvsannyam, Ariunbat ;
Savino, Matteo Mario ;
Amenta, Pietro .
PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 137 (02) :89-101
[4]   The Ecology of the Patient Visit Physical Attractiveness, Waiting Times, and Perceived Quality of Care [J].
Becker, Franklin ;
Douglass, Stephanie .
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 31 (02) :128-141
[5]   Determinants of satisfaction with health care provider interactions at health centres in central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study [J].
Birhanu, Zewdie ;
Assefa, Tsion ;
Woldie, Mirkuzie ;
Morankar, Sudhakar .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
[6]   A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter [J].
Clayman, Marla L. ;
Gulbrandsen, Pal ;
Morris, Megan A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (03) :600-604
[7]   Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits [J].
Clayman, ML ;
Roter, D ;
Wissow, LS ;
Bandeen-Roche, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (07) :1583-1591
[8]  
Crow H., 2002, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V6, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3310/HTA6320, 10.3310/hta6320]
[9]   Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions [J].
Eggly, Susan ;
Penner, Louis A. ;
Greene, Meredith ;
Harper, Felicity W. K. ;
Ruckdeschel, John C. ;
Albrecht, Terrance L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (11) :2974-2985
[10]   Shared Decision-making in Head and Neck Surgery A Review [J].
Forner, David ;
Noel, Christopher W. ;
Shuman, Andrew G. ;
Hong, Paul ;
Corsten, Martin ;
Rac, Valeria E. ;
Pieterse, Arwen H. ;
Goldstein, David .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (09) :839-844