Collaboration Size and Citation Impact in Big Data Research

被引:0
作者
Lyu, Xiaozan [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Xiaojing [1 ]
Zhou, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Dept Informat Resources Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies CWTS, Kolffpad 1,POB 905, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
来源
17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2019), VOL I | 2019年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GLOBALIZATION; EVOLUTION; SCIENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With rapid and widespread application, Big Data has attracted growing attention from academic communities. Concerning the importance of collaboration in scientific research, the current study focused on profiles of collaboration types and size, as well as their relations with citation impact based on publications indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) from 2003 to 2017, so as to provide decision-making basis for optimizing collaboration options. Results show that collaborated publications, as well as collaboration size (i.e., number of authors, institutions and countries) in Big Data have grown substantially. Within-institutional collaboration plays a main role, while international collaboration takes relatively low but rising share. Citation impact is dependent on collaboration types with international collaboration the most efficient, followed by domestic one. None-collaboration receives the least citations. Team size increases over time in general, and is positively related with citation impact, and such phenomenon exists in different collaboration types. Among all the research fields involved, Mathematics and Computer Science is the main contributor in publications and also benefits the most in collaboration despite of its limited team size.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 666
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The rise of research networks [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2012, 490 (7420) :335-336
[2]   The fourth age of research [J].
Adams, Jonathan .
NATURE, 2013, 497 (7451) :557-560
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Science engineering indicators 2018, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/EJOC.201200111
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS N
[5]   Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (11) :2215-2222
[6]   Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation [J].
Bozeman, B ;
Dietz, JS ;
Gaughan, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 22 (7-8) :716-740
[7]   Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data [J].
Chen, C. L. Philip ;
Zhang, Chun-Yang .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 275 :314-347
[8]   Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration [J].
Coccia, Mario ;
Bozeman, Barry .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 108 (03) :1065-1084
[9]   Big Data, Bigger Dilemmas: A Critical Review [J].
Ekbia, Hamid ;
Mattioli, Michael ;
Kouper, Inna ;
Arave, G. ;
Ghazinejad, Ali ;
Bowman, Timothy ;
Suri, Venkata Ratandeep ;
Tsou, Andrew ;
Weingart, Scott ;
Sugimoto, Cassidy R. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (08) :1523-1545
[10]  
European Commission, 2003, KNOWL BAS EC