Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:109
作者
Besancon, Lonni [1 ,2 ]
Peiffer-Smadja, Nathan [3 ,4 ]
Segalas, Corentin [5 ]
Jiang, Haiting [6 ]
Masuzzo, Paola [7 ]
Smout, Cooper [7 ]
Billy, Eric
Deforet, Maxime [8 ]
Leyrat, Clemence [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Linkoping Univ, Media & Informat Technol, Norrkoping, Sweden
[3] Univ Paris, IAME, INSERM, F-75018 Paris, France
[4] Imperial Coll London, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Hlth Protect Res Unit Healthcare Associated Infec, London, England
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[6] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[7] Inst Globally Distributed Open Res & Educ, Box 1074,Kristinehojdsgatan 9A, S-41282 Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, Inst Biol Paris Seine IBPS, Lab Jean Perrin LJP, Paris, France
[9] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, Inequal Canc Outcomes Network, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Open science; Peer review; Methodology; COVID-19; REPRODUCIBILITY; HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE; AZITHROMYCIN; JOURNALISM;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [1] Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints
    Abdill, Richard J.
    Blekhman, Ran
    [J]. ELIFE, 2019, 8
  • [2] Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
    Allen, Christopher
    Mehler, David M. A.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (05)
  • [3] Journals unite for reproducibility
    不详
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 515 (7525) : 7 - 7
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, COVID 19 RESOURCES L
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Retracted coronavirus. (COVID-19) papers
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, SCI JOURNALISM COVID
  • [7] Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
    Asendorpf, Jens B.
    Conner, Mark
    De Fruyt, Filip
    De Houwer, Jan
    Denissen, Jaap J. A.
    Fiedler, Klaus
    Fiedler, Susann
    Funder, David C.
    Kliegl, Reinhold
    Nosek, Brian A.
    Perugini, Marco
    Roberts, Brent W.
    Schmitt, Manfred
    vanAken, Marcel A. G.
    Weber, Hannelore
    Wicherts, Jelte M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 27 (02) : 108 - 119
  • [8] Telomeres and COVID-19
    Aviv, Abraham
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34 (06) : 7247 - 7252
  • [9] RETRACTED: Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients (Retracted Article)
    Bae, Seongman
    Kim, Min-Chul
    Kim, Ji Yeun
    Cha, Hye-Hee
    Lim, Joon Seo
    Jung, Jiwon
    Kim, Min-Jae
    Oh, Dong Kyu
    Lee, Mi-Kyung
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Sung, Minki
    Hong, Sang-Bum
    Chung, Jin-Won
    Kim, Sung-Han
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (01) : W22 - W23
  • [10] Baker M, 2016, NATURE, V533, P452, DOI 10.1038/533452a