Environmental impact of pig production affected by wet acid scrubber as mitigation technology

被引:12
|
作者
Conti, Cecilia [1 ]
Costantini, Michele [1 ]
Fusi, Alessandra [1 ]
Manzardo, Alessandro [2 ]
Guarino, Marcella [1 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, CESQA Qual & Environm Res Ctr, Dept Ind Engn, Via Marzolo 9, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
Pig farm; Air quality; Ammonia; Wet acid scrubber; Environmental impact; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; AIR SCRUBBERS; LIVESTOCK MANURE; GREENHOUSE GASES; AFFECTS SLURRY; LCA; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; ABATEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ammonia (NH3 ) is the most common air pollutant in pig farms, affecting animals and workers' health, and causing damages to ecosystems. Hence, there is a need to reduce NH3 emissions. Many mitigation strategies can be applied to limit gaseous emissions, such as the application of air treatment technologies. In this study, the environmental impact of a typical Italian pig farm, adopting a wet acid scrubber to abate NH3 emissions, was evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment approach. 1 kg of live weight (LW) was selected as Functional Unit. Two scenarios were considered. The baseline scenario (BS) represents the situation as it is, while the alternative scenario (AS) a wet scrubber prototype (with 70% NH3 removal efficiency) was adopted. For 8 of the 12 evaluated impact categories, AS shows the highest environmental impact, due to the scrubber construction and maintenance. However, it was the best for those impact categories most affected by NH3. Observed reduction ranged from 10% (for acidification, TA, and terrestrial eutrophication, TE) to 0.4% (for marine eutrophication, ME). The climate change impact was 3.55 kg CO2 eq kg(-1) LW and 3.65 kg CO2 eq kg(-1) LW for BS and AS, respectively. For almost all impact categories, the consumable materials for wet scrubber operation represented around 85% of the total impact of the scrubber. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that variation in NH3 removal efficiency had the greatest effect on particulate matter formation, TA, and TE. The achieved results provide a first quantitative indication of the environmental benefits that can be achieved using wet acid scrubber in naturally ventilated pig facilities. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 590
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Mitigation potential and environmental impact of centralized versus distributed BECCS with domestic biomass production in Great Britain
    Albanito, Fabrizio
    Hastings, Astley
    Fitton, Nuala
    Richards, Mark
    Martin, Mike
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    Bell, Dave
    Taylor, Simon C.
    Butnar, Isabela
    Li, Pei-Hao
    Slade, Raphael
    Smith, Pete
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2019, 11 (10): : 1234 - 1252
  • [22] Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries
    Ferreira, Joao J. M.
    Fernandes, Cristina I.
    Ferreira, Fernando A. F.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 150
  • [23] The effect of pretreatment choice on cellulosic ethanol production from sugarcane straw: An insight into environmental impact profile and GHG emissions mitigation potential in Brazil
    Nogueira, Guilherme Pessoa
    Hernandes, Thayse Aparecida Dourado
    Petrielli, Gabriel Palma
    Chagas, Mateus Ferreira
    Junqueira, Tassia Lopes
    McManus, Marcelle
    Leak, David
    Franco, Telma Teixeira
    Dias, Marina Oliveira de Souza
    Cavaliero, Carla Kazue Nakao
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2023, 175
  • [24] Production of Pig Feed under Future Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations: Changes in Crop Content and Chemical Composition, Land Use, Environmental Impact, and Socio-Economic Consequences
    Saxe, Henrik
    Hamelin, Lorie
    Hinrichsen, Torben
    Wenzel, Henrik
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [25] Multi-Risk Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Impact of Outdoor Pig Production Areas: A Case Study
    Horta, Carmo
    Roque, Natalia
    Batista, Marta
    Duarte, Antonio Canatario
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [26] Terephthalic Acid Production via Greener Spray Process: Comparative Economic and Environmental Impact Assessments with Mid-Century Process
    Li, Meng
    Ruddy, Thomas
    Fahey, Darryl
    Busch, Daryle H.
    Subramaniam, Bala
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (04): : 823 - 835
  • [27] The Environmental Impact of Lowering Dietary Crude Protein in Finishing Pig Diets-The Effect on Ammonia, Odour and Slurry Production
    Ball, M. Elizabeth E.
    Smyth, Sam
    Beattie, Violet E.
    McCracken, Kelvin J.
    McCormack, Ursula
    Muns, Ramon
    Gordon, Fred J.
    Bradford, Raymond
    Reid, L. Alanna
    Magowan, Elizabeth
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [28] Environmental impact and economic assessment of secondary lead production: Comparison of main spent lead-acid battery recycling processes in China
    Tian, Xi
    Wu, Yufeng
    Hou, Ping
    Liang, Sai
    Qu, Shen
    Xu, Ming
    Zuo, Tieyong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 144 : 142 - 148
  • [29] Biomass gasification as a key technology to reduce the environmental impact of virgin olive oil production: A Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Fernandez-Lobato, Lazuli
    Aguado, Roque
    Jurado, Francisco
    Vera, David
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2022, 165
  • [30] Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment
    Grunert, K. G.
    Sonntag, W. I.
    Glanz-Chanos, V.
    Forum, S.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 137 : 123 - 129