The Recovery College: A Unique Service Approach and Qualitative Evaluation

被引:28
作者
Newman-Taylor, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Stone, Nicola [3 ]
Valentine, Paul [3 ]
Hooks, Zoe [1 ]
Sault, Katherine [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Psychol Acad Unit, Room 4068,Shackleton Bldg,Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Southern Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Southern Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Hollybank, Havant, England
[4] Southern Hlth Fdn Trust, Calmore, England
关键词
recovery; Recovery College; coproduction; qualitative evaluation;
D O I
10.1037/prj0000179
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: This study examined the impact of a Recovery College, an educational service model focusing specifically on health care to engage people's hope, agency, and opportunities for recovery. Method: For the purpose of the study, a qualitative approach was used given the absence of research in this area. Eleven people completed semistructured interviews conducted by an independent researcher. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The analyses yielded themes emphasizing the impact of the organizational structure of the college. Coproduction of service delivery was contrasted with traditional provision and identified as fundamental to personal and professional changes made. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Recovery College participants described clear gains. These findings are discussed in relation to the recovery literature and highlight the need for routine coproduction of services to facilitate recovery from the often devastating impact of mental ill-health.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 190
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Recovery Colleges
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLOS GAP PRIOR ESS C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, No health without mental health
[4]  
[Anonymous], EQ EXC LIB NHS WHIT
[5]  
Anthony W.A., 1993, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, V16, P11, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0095655
[6]  
Beresford P., 2015, CLIN PSYCHOL FORUM, V268, P16
[7]  
Boyle D., 2009, The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services
[8]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[9]  
Davidson L., 2009, Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health Revue canadienne de sante mentale communataire, V28, P35
[10]  
Deegan P, 2004, 20 WORLD C REH INT R