Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review

被引:13
|
作者
Aebischer, Andrea S. [1 ]
Hau, Raphael [2 ,3 ]
de Steiger, Richard N. [4 ,5 ]
Holder, Carl [6 ]
Wall, Christopher J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Toowoomba Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Pechey St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Northern Med Sch, Epping, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
[5] Australian Orthopaed Assoc, Natl Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, MBiostat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Sch Med, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
关键词
periprosthetic fracture; distal femoral replacement; distal femur fracture; revision total knee arthroplasty; distal femur perirosthetic fracture; megaprosthesis; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMUR FRACTURES; REVISION; PROSTHESIS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a potential treatment option following periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is limited literature regarding implant survivorship and complication rates. The aim of this study was to examine patient demographics and trends in usage, implant survivorship and modes of failure, and patient mortality following DFR for PPF captured by a national joint replacement registry. Methods: A retrospective registry review was performed using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). In total, 306 DFR were performed for PPF of a known primary TKA. Eighty-five percent of patients were female, and the mean age was 76.4 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant and patient survivorship were performed. Results: The number of DFR performed for PPF has doubled over the past five years. The cumulative percent second revision rate at six years was 12%. The most common indications for revision were infection (37%) and aseptic loosening (33%). Patient survivorship after DFR was 97% and 83% at five and ten years, respectively. Conclusion: A national registry review has identified the increasing prevalence of DFR for PPF after primary TKA and demonstrated implant survivorship of 88% at midterm follow-up. Surgeons may consider DFR as an acceptable and durable treatment option. Level of Evidence: Level III - Case Series.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1358
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients
    Girgis E.
    McAllen C.
    Keenan J.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (1) : 95 - 102
  • [42] Does Knee Prosthesis Survivorship Improve When Implant Designs Change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
    Lewis, Peter L.
    Graves, Stephen E.
    de Steiger, Richard N.
    Campbell, David G.
    Peng, Yi
    Hatton, Alesha
    Lorimer, Michelle
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (06) : 1156 - 1172
  • [43] Effect of glenosphere size on reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR)
    Page, Richard
    Beazley, James
    Graves, Stephen
    Rainbird, Sophia
    Peng, Yi
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (06) : E289 - E301
  • [44] Is Distal Femoral Replacement an Adequate Therapeutic Option after Complex Fractures of the Distal Femur?
    Fakler, J. K. M.
    Hepp, P.
    Marquass, B.
    von dercks, N.
    Josten, C.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2013, 151 (02): : 173 - 179
  • [45] Collared Cementless Femoral Components Reduce the Revision Rates in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: An Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Study
    Rele, Siddharth
    O'Bryan, Edward
    Holder, Carl
    Lewis, Peter L.
    Di Bella, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09)
  • [46] Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement
    Hoellwarth, Jason S.
    Fourman, Mitchell S.
    Crossett, Lawrence
    Goodman, Mark
    Siska, Peter
    Moloney, Gele B.
    Tarkin, Ivan S.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (02): : 392 - 397
  • [47] Periprosthetic fractures in the distal femur following total knee replacement: A review and guide to management
    Johnston, Andrew T.
    Tsiridis, Elefterios
    Eyres, Keith S.
    Toms, Andrew D.
    KNEE, 2012, 19 (03) : 156 - 162
  • [48] Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications
    Pavelka, T.
    Salasek, M.
    Weisova, D.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2017, 84 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [49] A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nikhil Ponugoti
    Aashish Raghu
    Jonathan David Kosy
    Henry Magill
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 3335 - 3345
  • [50] Supracondylar Periprosthetic Fractures of the Knee in the Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Treatment Using Allograft-Implant Composites, Standard Revision Components, Distal Femoral Replacement Prosthesis
    Saidi, Kevan
    Ben-Lulu, Oren
    Tsuji, Matthew
    Safir, Oleg
    Gross, Allan E.
    Backstein, David
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (01) : 110 - 114