Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review

被引:13
|
作者
Aebischer, Andrea S. [1 ]
Hau, Raphael [2 ,3 ]
de Steiger, Richard N. [4 ,5 ]
Holder, Carl [6 ]
Wall, Christopher J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Toowoomba Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Pechey St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Northern Med Sch, Epping, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
[5] Australian Orthopaed Assoc, Natl Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, MBiostat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Sch Med, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
关键词
periprosthetic fracture; distal femoral replacement; distal femur fracture; revision total knee arthroplasty; distal femur perirosthetic fracture; megaprosthesis; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMUR FRACTURES; REVISION; PROSTHESIS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a potential treatment option following periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is limited literature regarding implant survivorship and complication rates. The aim of this study was to examine patient demographics and trends in usage, implant survivorship and modes of failure, and patient mortality following DFR for PPF captured by a national joint replacement registry. Methods: A retrospective registry review was performed using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). In total, 306 DFR were performed for PPF of a known primary TKA. Eighty-five percent of patients were female, and the mean age was 76.4 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant and patient survivorship were performed. Results: The number of DFR performed for PPF has doubled over the past five years. The cumulative percent second revision rate at six years was 12%. The most common indications for revision were infection (37%) and aseptic loosening (33%). Patient survivorship after DFR was 97% and 83% at five and ten years, respectively. Conclusion: A national registry review has identified the increasing prevalence of DFR for PPF after primary TKA and demonstrated implant survivorship of 88% at midterm follow-up. Surgeons may consider DFR as an acceptable and durable treatment option. Level of Evidence: Level III - Case Series.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1358
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of locking compression plate and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study
    Fu, Peng
    Liang, Wenwei
    Gao, Zhenzhen
    Zheng, Song
    Fan, Weimin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (10)
  • [2] Distal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures around a total knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis
    Wood, Matthew J.
    Al-Jabri, Talal
    Stelzhammer, Thomas
    Brivio, Angela
    Donaldson, James
    Skinner, John A.
    Barrett, David
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2024, 16
  • [3] High revision rates and mortality after distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: analysis from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD)
    Luetzner, Joerg
    Melsheimer, Oliver
    Steinbrueck, Arnd
    Postler, Anne Elisabeth
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 331 - 338
  • [4] Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?
    Darrith, Brian
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Karadsheh, Mark S.
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Berger, Richard A.
    Levine, Brett R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05) : 1402 - 1406
  • [5] Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A Systematic Review
    Rubinger, Luc
    Khalik, Hassaan Abdel
    Gazendam, Aaron
    Wolfstadt, Jesse
    Khoshbin, Amir
    Tushinski, Daniel
    Johal, Herman
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2021, 35 (11) : 573 - 583
  • [6] High revision rates and mortality after distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: analysis from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD)
    Jörg Lützner
    Oliver Melsheimer
    Arnd Steinbrück
    Anne Elisabeth Postler
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 : 331 - 338
  • [7] Distal Femoral Replacement for Fractures Allows for Early Mobilization with Low Complication Rates: A Multicenter Review
    Stancil, Ryan
    Romm, Jacob
    Lack, William
    Bohnenkamp, Frank
    Sems, Stephen
    Cross, William
    Cass, Joseph
    Keeney, James
    Nam, Denis
    Nunley, Ryan
    Fernando, Navin
    Sassoon, Adam
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [8] THE TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT A Critical Analysis Review
    Quinzi, David A.
    Childs, Sean
    Lipof, Jason S.
    Soin, Sandeep P.
    Ricciardi, Benjamin F.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [9] Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bundschuh, Kyle E.
    Grommersch, Bryan M.
    Tipton, Shane C.
    Chihab, Samir
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Guild, George N., III
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S450 - S458
  • [10] Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: A systematic review
    Lex, Johnathan R.
    Di Michele, Joseph
    Sepehri, Aresh
    Chuang, Tim C.
    Backstein, David J.
    Kreder, Hans J.
    KNEE, 2022, 37 : 121 - 131