Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review

被引:13
作者
Aebischer, Andrea S. [1 ]
Hau, Raphael [2 ,3 ]
de Steiger, Richard N. [4 ,5 ]
Holder, Carl [6 ]
Wall, Christopher J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Toowoomba Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Pechey St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Northern Med Sch, Epping, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australia
[5] Australian Orthopaed Assoc, Natl Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, MBiostat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Sch Med, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
关键词
periprosthetic fracture; distal femoral replacement; distal femur fracture; revision total knee arthroplasty; distal femur perirosthetic fracture; megaprosthesis; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMUR FRACTURES; REVISION; PROSTHESIS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a potential treatment option following periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is limited literature regarding implant survivorship and complication rates. The aim of this study was to examine patient demographics and trends in usage, implant survivorship and modes of failure, and patient mortality following DFR for PPF captured by a national joint replacement registry. Methods: A retrospective registry review was performed using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). In total, 306 DFR were performed for PPF of a known primary TKA. Eighty-five percent of patients were female, and the mean age was 76.4 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of implant and patient survivorship were performed. Results: The number of DFR performed for PPF has doubled over the past five years. The cumulative percent second revision rate at six years was 12%. The most common indications for revision were infection (37%) and aseptic loosening (33%). Patient survivorship after DFR was 97% and 83% at five and ten years, respectively. Conclusion: A national registry review has identified the increasing prevalence of DFR for PPF after primary TKA and demonstrated implant survivorship of 88% at midterm follow-up. Surgeons may consider DFR as an acceptable and durable treatment option. Level of Evidence: Level III - Case Series.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1358
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Atrey A, 2017, J ORTHOP, V14, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2016.12.006
[2]   Periprosthetic fractures of the knee: a comprehensive review [J].
Benkovich, Vadim ;
Klassov, Yuri ;
Mazilis, Boris ;
Bloom, Shlomo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) :387-399
[3]   Radiological evaluation of the proximal tibiofibular joint in knees with severe primary osteoarthritis [J].
Boya, Hakan ;
Oezcan, Ozal ;
Oeztekin, Haluk H. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (02) :157-159
[4]   The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures [J].
Cannon, Stephen Robert .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) :1945-1950
[5]   Contemporary Distal Femoral Replacements for Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Around Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties [J].
Chalmers, Brian P. ;
Syku, Marie ;
Gausden, Elizabeth B. ;
Blevins, Jason L. ;
Mayman, David J. ;
Sculco, Peter K. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07) :S351-S357
[6]   Primary Versus Secondary Distal Femoral Arthroplasty for Treatment of Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Femur Fractures [J].
Chen, Antonia F. ;
Choi, Lisa E. ;
Colman, Matthew W. ;
Goodman, Mark A. ;
Crossett, Lawrence S. ;
Tarkin, Ivan S. ;
McGough, Richard L. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (09) :1580-1584
[7]   Revision Arthroplasty Using a MUTARS® Prosthesis in Comminuted Periprosthetic Fracture of the Distal Femur [J].
Choi, Hyung-Suk ;
Nho, Jae-Hwi ;
Kim, Chung-Hyun ;
Kwon, Sai-Won ;
Park, Jong-Seok ;
Suh, You-Sung .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 57 (06) :1517-1522
[8]   Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? [J].
Darrith, Brian ;
Bohl, Daniel D. ;
Karadsheh, Mark S. ;
Sporer, Scott M. ;
Berger, Richard A. ;
Levine, Brett R. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05) :1402-1406
[9]   Treatment of hallux valgus deformity [J].
Fraissler, Lukas ;
Konrads, Christian ;
Hoberg, Maik ;
Rudert, Maximilian ;
Walcher, Matthias .
EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2016, 1 (08) :295-302
[10]   Comparing Outcomes of Tumor Prosthesis Revision and Locking Plate Fixation in Supracondylar Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures [J].
Gan, Gerrard ;
Teo, Yee Hong ;
Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee .
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (02) :174-180