Improving results in solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage, thymoglobin induction, and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression

被引:27
|
作者
Stratta, RJ
Lo, A
Shokouh-Amiri, MH
Egidi, MF
Gaber, LW
Gaber, AS
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Surg Transplant, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Clin Pharm, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Dept Med, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[5] Univ Tennessee, Dept Pathol, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
antibody induction; daclizumab; pancreas-after-kidney transplantation; pancreas-alone transplantation; surgical technique;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00279.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Advances in surgical techniques and clinical immunosuppression have led to steadily improving results in pancreas transplantation (PTX). The purpose of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcomes in patients undergoing solitary PTX with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage and contemporary immunosuppression. From June 1998 through December 2000, we performed 28 solitary PTXs with antibody induction and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy. The first 13 patients received daclizumab (DAC) induction, while the next 15 received thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-human thymocyte gamma globulin; Thymo) induction. The study group included 13 pancreas alone (PA) and 15 sequential pancreas-after-kidney-transplantations (PAKT). Solitary PTX was performed with P-E drainage in 18 patients and systemic-enteric (S-E) drainage in ten. Patient and pancreas graft survival rates were 96% and 79%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 22 (range 1-39) months. The 1-year actual death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was 89%. One PAKT patient died with a functioning graft at I month; three patients (11%) experienced early graft loss due to thrombosis and were excluded from the immunological analysis, leaving 24 evaluable patients. The incidence of acute rejection was 54%, including 50% in PA and 58% in PAKT recipients (P=NS). In patients receiving Thymo induction, the rate of acute rejection was slightly lower (43% Thymo vs 70% DAC). Moreover, P-E drainage was associated with a slightly lower rate of acute rejection (44% P-E vs 75% S-E; P=NS). In patients with both Thymo induction and P-E drainage (n = 11), there was a tendency toward less rejection (the incidence of acute rejection was 36%). Two immunological graft losses occurred (one due to non-compliance), both in patients with P-E drainage. Only one patient had a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Event-free survival (no rejection, graft loss, or death) was slightly higher in patients receiving Thymo (47%) than in those on DAC (23%) induction (P=NS). We can conclude that solitary PTX with P-E drainage and Thymo induction may be associated with improved intermediate-term outcomes and a possible immunological advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A single center experience with 104 cases of pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage
    Stratta, RJ
    Gaber, AO
    Shokouh-Amiri, MH
    Grewal, HP
    Egidi, MF
    Reddy, KS
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (09) : S566 - S566
  • [22] Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for induction and maintenance therapy after pancreas transplantation
    Gruessner, RWG
    Sutherland, DER
    Drangstveit, MB
    West, M
    Gruessner, AC
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (02) : 518 - 520
  • [23] β-Herpesvirus activation after kidney transplantation with mycophenolate mofetil-based maintenance immunosuppression
    Folkmane, I
    Chapenko, S
    Amerika, D
    Bicans, J
    Murovska, M
    Rosentals, R
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (03) : 2384 - 2385
  • [24] RESULTS OF PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION WITH PORTAL VENOUS AND ENTERIC DRAINAGE
    GABER, AO
    SHOKOUHAMIRI, MH
    HATHAWAY, DK
    HAMMONTREE, L
    KITABCHI, AE
    GABER, LW
    SAAD, MF
    BRITT, LG
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (06) : 613 - 624
  • [25] Pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage under tacrolimus induction therapy
    Corry, RJ
    Egidi, MF
    Shapiro, E
    Jordan, M
    Dodson, SF
    Scantlebury, V
    Vivas, C
    Gritsch, HA
    Fung, JJ
    Starzl, TE
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) : 642 - 642
  • [26] Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus era: Evolution from induction therapy with bladder drainage to noninduction therapy with enteric drainage - Discussion
    Bumgardner, GL
    Sutherland, DER
    Schulak, JA
    Kaufman, DB
    SURGERY, 2000, 128 (04) : 735 - 737
  • [27] Initial Australasian experience with portal-enteric drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation
    Kave, Ben
    Yii, Ming
    Bell, Roger
    Kanellis, John
    Scott, David
    Saunder, Alan
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (10) : 722 - 727
  • [28] Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and Daclizumab induction in renal transplantation
    Rostaing, L
    Cantarovich, D
    Mourad, G
    Budde, K
    Rigotti, P
    Mariat, C
    Margreiter, R
    Capdevilla, L
    Lang, P
    Vialtel, P
    Ortuño-Mirete, J
    Charpentier, B
    Legendre, C
    Sanchez-Plumed, J
    Oppenheimer, F
    Kessler, M
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (07) : 807 - 814
  • [29] A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage
    Stratta, RJ
    Shokouh-Amiri, MH
    Egidi, MF
    Grewal, HP
    Kizilisik, AT
    Nezakatgoo, N
    Gaber, LW
    Gaber, AO
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (06) : 740 - 751
  • [30] A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation
    Stratta, RJ
    Gaber, AO
    Shokouh-Amiri, MH
    Reddy, KS
    Egidi, MF
    Grewal, HP
    Gaber, LW
    SURGERY, 2000, 127 (02) : 217 - 226