Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:64
|
作者
Niedermaier, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Balavarca, Yesilda [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Prevent Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2020年 / 115卷 / 01期
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; AVERAGE-RISK; SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ADVANCED ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but evidence for variation in sensitivity according to the CRC stage is sparse and has not yet been systematically synthesized. Thus, our objective was to systematically review and summarize evidence on the stage-specific sensitivity of FITs. METHODS: We screened PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 14, 2019, for English-language articles reporting on the stage-specific sensitivity of FIT for CRC detection using colonoscopy as a reference standard. Studies reporting stage-specific sensitivities and the specificity of FIT for CRC detection were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity according to the CRC stage and study setting (screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies) were derived from bivariate meta-analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four studies (92,447 participants including 3,034 CRC cases) were included. Pooled stage-specific sensitivities were overall very similar but suffered from high levels of imprecision because of small case numbers when calculated separately for screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies. Pooled sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) for all studies combined were 73% (65%-79%) for stage-I-CRCs and 80% (74%-84%), 82% (77%-87%), and 79% (70%-86%) for the detection of CRC stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Even substantially larger variation was seen in sensitivity by T-stage, with summary estimates ranging from 40% (21%-64%) for T1 to 83% (68%-91%) for T3-CRC. DISCUSSION: Although FITs detect 4 of 5 CRCs at stages II-IV, the substantially lower sensitivity for stage-I-CRC and, in particular, T1 CRC indicates both need and potential for further improvement in performance for the early detection of CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 69
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yakoubovitch, Stephanie
    Zaki, Timothy
    Anand, Sanya
    Pecoriello, Jillian
    Liang, Peter S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : 1829 - 1840
  • [42] Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Fengyi
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Yu, Jiadan
    Liu, Shaxin
    Zhang, Rengang
    Ma, Xichao
    Yang, Yonghong
    Wang, Pu
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2017, 2017
  • [43] Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Montalvan-Sanchez, Eleazar E.
    Norwood, Dalton A.
    Dougherty, Michael
    Beas, Renato
    Guranizo-Ortiz, Maria
    Ramirez-Rojas, Miriam
    Morgan, Douglas R.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [44] Effectiveness of bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yu
    Mao, Qianqian
    Zhou, Manling
    Liu, Cheng-Jiang
    Kong, Li
    Hu, Ting
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Volk, Robert J.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Saraykar, Smita S.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 779 - 791
  • [46] Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer or polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jayasekara, Harindra
    Reece, Jeanette C.
    Buchanan, Daniel D.
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    Parry, Susan
    Jenkins, Mark A.
    Win, Aung Ko
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (02) : 301 - 326
  • [47] Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Muller, Charles
    Yamada, Akihiro
    Ikegami, Sachie
    Haider, Haider
    Komaki, Yuga
    Komaki, Fukiko
    Micic, Dejan
    Sakuraba, Atsushi
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (03) : 622 - +
  • [48] Effectiveness of bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu Song
    Qianqian Mao
    Manling Zhou
    Cheng-Jiang Liu
    Li Kong
    Ting Hu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 24
  • [49] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic and Prognostic Serum Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer
    Liu, Zhongyu
    Zhang, Yingchong
    Niu, Yulong
    Li, Ke
    Liu, Xin
    Chen, Huijuan
    Gao, Chunfang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [50] Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Weimiao
    Huang, Junjie
    Yang, Yihui
    Gu, Kai
    Luu, Hung N.
    Tan, Songsong
    Yang, Chen
    Fu, Jiongxing
    Bao, Pingping
    Ying, Tao
    Withers, Mellissa
    Mao, Dandan
    Chen, Sikun
    Gong, Yangming
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Xu, Wanghong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 620 - 631