Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:69
作者
Niedermaier, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Balavarca, Yesilda [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Brenner, Hermann [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Prevent Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; AVERAGE-RISK; SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ADVANCED ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but evidence for variation in sensitivity according to the CRC stage is sparse and has not yet been systematically synthesized. Thus, our objective was to systematically review and summarize evidence on the stage-specific sensitivity of FITs. METHODS: We screened PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 14, 2019, for English-language articles reporting on the stage-specific sensitivity of FIT for CRC detection using colonoscopy as a reference standard. Studies reporting stage-specific sensitivities and the specificity of FIT for CRC detection were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity according to the CRC stage and study setting (screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies) were derived from bivariate meta-analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four studies (92,447 participants including 3,034 CRC cases) were included. Pooled stage-specific sensitivities were overall very similar but suffered from high levels of imprecision because of small case numbers when calculated separately for screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies. Pooled sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) for all studies combined were 73% (65%-79%) for stage-I-CRCs and 80% (74%-84%), 82% (77%-87%), and 79% (70%-86%) for the detection of CRC stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Even substantially larger variation was seen in sensitivity by T-stage, with summary estimates ranging from 40% (21%-64%) for T1 to 83% (68%-91%) for T3-CRC. DISCUSSION: Although FITs detect 4 of 5 CRCs at stages II-IV, the substantially lower sensitivity for stage-I-CRC and, in particular, T1 CRC indicates both need and potential for further improvement in performance for the early detection of CRC.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 69
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[21]   Usefulness of fecal lactoferrin and hemoglobin in diagnosis of colorectal diseases [J].
Hirata, Ichiro ;
Hoshimoto, Masahiro ;
Saito, Osamu ;
Kayazawa, Masanobu ;
Nishikawa, Takashi ;
Murano, Mitsuyuki ;
Toshina, Ken ;
Wang, Fang-Yu ;
Matsuse, Ryoichi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (10) :1569-1574
[22]   Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Imperiale, Thomas F. ;
Gruber, Rachel N. ;
Stump, Timothy E. ;
Emmett, Thomas W. ;
Monahan, Patrick O. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 170 (05) :319-+
[23]   Plasma Septin9 versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Johnson, David A. ;
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Mergener, Klaus ;
Weiss, Gunter ;
Koenig, Thomas ;
Beck, Juergen ;
Potter, Nicholas T. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06)
[24]   A simplified, non-invasive fecal-based DNA integrity assay and iFOBT for colorectal cancer detection [J].
Kalimutho, Murugan ;
Blanco, Giovanna Del Vecchio ;
Cretella, Micaela ;
Mannisi, Elena ;
Sileri, Pierpaolo ;
Formosa, Amanda ;
Pallone, Francesco ;
Federici, Giorgio ;
Bernardini, Sergio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (05) :583-592
[25]   Improved Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Using a Combination of Fecal Occult Blood and Novel Fecal Protein Markers [J].
Karl, Johann ;
Wild, Norbert ;
Tacke, Michael ;
Andres, Herbert ;
Garczarek, Ursula ;
Rollinger, Wolfgang ;
Zolg, Werner .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (10) :1122-1128
[26]   Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer A Meta-analysis [J].
Katsoula, Anastasia ;
Paschos, Paschalis ;
Haidich, Anna-Bettina ;
Tsapas, Apostolos ;
Giouleme, Olga .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (08) :1110-1118
[27]   Immunological faecal occult blood testing: A discriminatory test to identify colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients [J].
Kaul, A. ;
Shah, A. ;
Magill, F. H. ;
Hawkins, S. A. ;
Skaife, P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (04) :329-331
[28]   A Predictive Model Combining Fecal Calgranulin B and Fecal Occult Blood Tests Can Improve the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer [J].
Kim, Byung Chang ;
Joo, Jungnam ;
Chang, Hee Jin ;
Yeo, Hyun Yang ;
Yoo, Byong Chul ;
Park, Boram ;
Park, Ji Won ;
Sohn, Dae Kyung ;
Hong, Chang Won ;
Han, Kyung Su .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09)
[29]   Fecal miR-106a Is a Useful Marker for Colorectal Cancer Patients with False-Negative Results in Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test [J].
Koga, Yoshikatsu ;
Yamazaki, Nobuyoshi ;
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki ;
Yamamoto, Seiichiro ;
Saito, Norio ;
Kakugawa, Yasuo ;
Otake, Yosuke ;
Matsumoto, Minori ;
Matsumura, Yasuhiro .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (10) :1844-1852
[30]   Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Lee, Jeffrey K. ;
Liles, Elizabeth G. ;
Bent, Stephen ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Corley, Douglas A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (03) :171-+