Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

被引:3
|
作者
Deutsch, Marcus-Andre [1 ]
Zittermann, Armin [1 ]
Renner, Andre [1 ]
Schramm, Rene [1 ]
Gotte, Julia [1 ]
Borgermann, Jochen [2 ]
Fox, Henrik [1 ]
Rojas, Sebastian, V [1 ]
Gyoten, Takayuki [1 ]
Morshuis, Michiel [1 ]
Koster, Andreas [3 ]
Hulde, Nikolai [3 ]
Hinse, Dennis [4 ]
Hakim-Meibodi, Kavous [1 ]
Gummert, Jan F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Georgstr 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
[2] Heart Ctr Duisburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Duisburg, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Inst Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
[4] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Inst Lab & Transfus Med, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Myocardial revascularization; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; Off-pump surgery; ON-PUMP; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; REVASCULARIZATION; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivab179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Recent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort. METHODS: A total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was allcause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; P= 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13; P = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Data do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-Term Outcomes after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Ventricular Dysfunction
    Fukui, Toshihiro
    Tabata, Minoru
    Takanashi, Shuichiro
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 20 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [2] Long-Term Outcomes of On-Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Smart, Neil A.
    Dieberg, Gudrun
    King, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (09) : 983 - 991
  • [3] Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Williams, ML
    Muhlbaier, LH
    Schroder, JN
    Hata, JA
    Peterson, ED
    Smith, PK
    Landolfo, KP
    Messier, RH
    Davis, RD
    Milano, CA
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (09) : I366 - I370
  • [4] Long-Term Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Strategies
    Kim, Joon Bum
    Yun, Sung-Cheol
    Lim, Jae Wong
    Hwang, Soo Kyung
    Jung, Sung-Ho
    Song, Hyun
    Chung, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Jae Won
    Choo, Suk Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (21) : 2280 - 2288
  • [5] Acute clinical and financial outcomes of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Bakhtiyar, Syed Shahyan
    Sareh, Sohail
    Ali, Konmal
    Verma, Arjun
    Chervu, Nikhil
    Sanaiha, Yas
    Benharash, Peyman
    SURGERY, 2023, 174 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [6] Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk
    Polomsky, Marek
    He, Xia
    O'Brien, Sean M.
    Puskas, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (05): : 1193 - 1198
  • [7] Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term percutaneous coronary interventions
    Barili, Fabio
    Rosato, Stefano
    D'Errigo, Paola
    Parolari, Alessandro
    Fusco, Danilo
    Perucci, Carlo Alberto
    Menicanti, Lorenzo
    Seccareccia, Fulvia
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (04): : 902 - 909
  • [8] Long-term outcomes of multiple and single arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
    Zhu, Pengxiong
    Chen, Anqing
    Wang, Zhe
    Ye, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Mi
    Liu, Jun
    Zhao, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (03) : 909 - 919
  • [9] Does Age at Operation Influence the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?
    Ohira, Suguru
    Doi, Kiyoshi
    Numata, Satoshi
    Yamazaki, Sachiko
    Yamamoto, Tsunehisa
    Fukuishi, Megumi
    Fujita, Akie
    Yaku, Hitoshi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (10) : 2177 - 2185
  • [10] Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Moller, Christian H.
    Steinbruechel, Daniel A.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 16 (03)