The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients

被引:75
|
作者
Hawker, G
Ridout, R
Ricupero, M
Jaglal, S
Bogoch, E
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Med,Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Osteoporosis Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Mobil Program, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evalut, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
关键词
fracture clinic intervention; fragility fractures; osteoporosis; pre-post study;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-003-1377-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We examined the effect of a fracture clinic intervention in reducing previously documented undertreatment of osteoporosis (OP) in individuals with fragility fractures. Fragility fracture patients presenting to five community fracture clinics with no prior diagnosis of, or treatment for OP, and whose radiographic appearance was consistent with fragility fracture, were included. These individuals (intervention group) were informed of their OP risk, and advised to follow up with their physician for assessment. A standardized letter, intended for the physician and outlining the same was provided. Three months later, a telephone interview determined whether a physician visit had occurred, and if so, what investigation and treatment recommendations were made. These outcomes were compared with those for an equal number of age- and sex-matched fragility fracture 'controls,' selected from among fracture clinic attendees in the 6-9 months preceding the intervention. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of having received the intervention on physician follow-up, bone density testing, and OP treatment recommendations. The mean age of the 278 participants (139 per group) was 66.0 years; 74% were female. Adjusting for age, sex, hospital, and perceived diagnosis of OP, those who received the intervention were more likely to follow up with a physician (adjusted OR 1.85, p=0.02) and to be recommended bone density testing (adjusted OR 5.22, p<0.0001), but were not more likely to receive an OP treatment recommendation (adjusted OR 2.07, p=0.07). It is concluded that a simple fracture clinic intervention increased follow-up and investigation, but not treatment for OP, in fragility fracture patients. Individuals recommended treatment for OP were more likely to perceive themselves as having OP and to have had a previous fragility fracture. Our findings suggest that future interventions should incorporate assessment of patients' OP health beliefs and education about risk factors for fracture, and should be coupled with physician education to achieve optimal results.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy’s fracture clinic screening program
    D. E. Beaton
    S. Dyer
    D. Jiang
    R. Sujic
    M. Slater
    J. E. M. Sale
    E. R. Bogoch
    Osteoporosis International, 2014, 25 : 289 - 296
  • [32] Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's fracture clinic screening program
    Beaton, D. E.
    Dyer, S.
    Jiang, D.
    Sujic, R.
    Slater, M.
    Sale, J. E. M.
    Bogoch, E. R.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (01) : 289 - 296
  • [33] The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial
    Bessette, L.
    Davison, K. S.
    Jean, S.
    Roy, S.
    Ste-Marie, L. G.
    Brown, J. P.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (12) : 2963 - 2972
  • [34] The Effectiveness of Fracture Liaison Services in Improving Fragility Fracture Outcomes
    Nitasha Khullar
    Maria I. Danila
    Current Treatment Options in Rheumatology, 2022, 8 : 19 - 35
  • [35] The Effectiveness of Fracture Liaison Services in Improving Fragility Fracture Outcomes
    Khullar, Nitasha
    Danila, Maria I.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 8 (02) : 19 - 35
  • [36] Fracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis
    Walters, Samuel
    Khan, Tanvir
    Ong, Terence
    Sahota, Opinder
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2017, 12 : 117 - 127
  • [37] The impact of educational interventions on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis after a fragility fracture
    Beaudoin, C.
    Bessette, L.
    Jean, S.
    Ste-Marie, L. -G.
    Brown, J. P.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 (07) : 1821 - 1830
  • [38] Post-Fracture Care Program: Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Adults with Fragility Fractures
    Yasser El Miedany
    Mathias Toth
    Walaa Elwakil
    Sally Saber
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2023, 21 : 472 - 484
  • [39] Post-Fracture Care Program: Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Adults with Fragility Fractures
    El Miedany, Yasser
    Toth, Mathias
    Elwakil, Walaa
    Saber, Sally
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2023, 21 (04) : 472 - 484
  • [40] Improving care after hip fracture: the fracture? Think osteoporosis (FTOP) program
    Dore, Naomi
    Kennedy, Courtney
    Fisher, Pauline
    Dolovich, Lisa
    Farrauto, Leonardo
    Papaioannou, Alexandra
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2013, 13