The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients

被引:75
|
作者
Hawker, G
Ridout, R
Ricupero, M
Jaglal, S
Bogoch, E
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Med,Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Osteoporosis Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Mobil Program, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evalut, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
关键词
fracture clinic intervention; fragility fractures; osteoporosis; pre-post study;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-003-1377-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We examined the effect of a fracture clinic intervention in reducing previously documented undertreatment of osteoporosis (OP) in individuals with fragility fractures. Fragility fracture patients presenting to five community fracture clinics with no prior diagnosis of, or treatment for OP, and whose radiographic appearance was consistent with fragility fracture, were included. These individuals (intervention group) were informed of their OP risk, and advised to follow up with their physician for assessment. A standardized letter, intended for the physician and outlining the same was provided. Three months later, a telephone interview determined whether a physician visit had occurred, and if so, what investigation and treatment recommendations were made. These outcomes were compared with those for an equal number of age- and sex-matched fragility fracture 'controls,' selected from among fracture clinic attendees in the 6-9 months preceding the intervention. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of having received the intervention on physician follow-up, bone density testing, and OP treatment recommendations. The mean age of the 278 participants (139 per group) was 66.0 years; 74% were female. Adjusting for age, sex, hospital, and perceived diagnosis of OP, those who received the intervention were more likely to follow up with a physician (adjusted OR 1.85, p=0.02) and to be recommended bone density testing (adjusted OR 5.22, p<0.0001), but were not more likely to receive an OP treatment recommendation (adjusted OR 2.07, p=0.07). It is concluded that a simple fracture clinic intervention increased follow-up and investigation, but not treatment for OP, in fragility fracture patients. Individuals recommended treatment for OP were more likely to perceive themselves as having OP and to have had a previous fragility fracture. Our findings suggest that future interventions should incorporate assessment of patients' OP health beliefs and education about risk factors for fracture, and should be coupled with physician education to achieve optimal results.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients
    Gillian Hawker
    Rowena Ridout
    Maria Ricupero
    Susan Jaglal
    Earl Bogoch
    Osteoporosis International, 2003, 14 : 171 - 178
  • [2] Improving osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic
    Charalambous, C. P.
    Mosey, C.
    Johnstone, E.
    Akimau, P.
    Gullett, T. K.
    Siddique, I.
    Wilkes, R. A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2009, 91 (07) : 596 - 598
  • [3] Factors predictive of the perceived osteoporosis-fracture link in fragility fracture patients
    Sujic, Rebeka
    Gignac, Monique A.
    Cockerill, Rhonda
    Beaton, Dorcas E.
    MATURITAS, 2013, 76 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [4] Measuring the Impact of Pharmacist Intervention: Results of Patient Education about Osteoporosis after Fragility Fracture
    Ho, Clarene
    Cranney, Ann
    Campbell, Anna
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2006, 59 (04) : 184 - 193
  • [5] OFELIA: Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Fragility Fracture Patients
    Randi M. H. Tei
    Cecilia H. Ramlau-Hansen
    Oleguer Plana-Ripoll
    Ole Brink
    Bente L. Langdahl
    Calcified Tissue International, 2019, 104 : 102 - 114
  • [6] OFELIA: Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Fragility Fracture Patients
    Tei, Randi M. H.
    Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia H.
    Plana-Ripoll, Oleguer
    Brink, Ole
    Langdahl, Bente L.
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 104 (01) : 102 - 114
  • [7] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Macias-Hernandez, Salvador Israel
    Degollado-Rodriguez, Miriam Macarena
    Maldonado-Sanchez, Horacio
    de Leon, Andrea Olascoaga-Gomez
    Coronado-Zarco, Roberto
    Nava-Bringas, Tania Ines
    Ramirez-Perez, Esperanza
    Cruz-Medina, Eva
    Espinosa-Morales, Rolando
    Morones-Alba, Juan Daniel
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [8] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Salvador Israel Macías-Hernández
    Miriam Macarena Degollado-Rodríguez
    Horacio Maldonado-Sánchez
    Andrea Olascoaga-Gómez de León
    Roberto Coronado-Zarco
    Tania Inés Nava-Bringas
    Esperanza Ramírez-Pérez
    Eva Cruz-Medina
    Rolando Espinosa-Morales
    Juan Daniel Morones-Alba
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2021, 16
  • [9] Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review
    V. Elliot-Gibson
    E. R. Bogoch
    S. A. Jamal
    D. E. Beaton
    Osteoporosis International, 2004, 15 : 767 - 778
  • [10] Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review
    Elliot-Gibson, V
    Bogoch, ER
    Jamal, SA
    Beaton, DE
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (10) : 767 - 778