Assessing the Risks to Bats from Plant Protection Products: A Review of the Recent European Food Safety Authority Statement Regarding Toxicity and Exposure Routes

被引:4
作者
Brooks, A. C. [1 ]
Nopper, J. [2 ]
Weyers, A. [3 ]
Crosland, H. [1 ]
Foudoulakis, M. [4 ]
Haaf, S. [5 ]
Hackett, M. [1 ]
Lawrence, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Environm Assessments, Cambridge, England
[2] BASF, Limburgerhof, Germany
[3] Bayer, CropSci Div, Monheim, Germany
[4] CortevaTM Agrisci, Halandri, Greece
[5] ADAMA Deutschland, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Bats; Chiroptera; Pesticides; Risk assessment; Toxicity; Exposure; BROWN; ECHOLOCATION;
D O I
10.1002/etc.5209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wild birds and mammals that feed in agricultural habitats are potentially exposed to pesticides through various routes. Until recently, it has been implicitly assumed that the existing European Union risk assessment scheme for birds and mammals also covered bats (Chiroptera). However, recent publications raised concerns and, in 2019, a scientific statement was published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) that concluded that bats were not adequately covered by the current risk assessment scheme. We review the evidence presented and assumptions made in the EFSA bat statement relating to toxicity, bioaccumulation, and exposure pathways (oral, dermal, and inhalation), in terms of their relevance for bats potentially foraging in agricultural areas in the European Union; we highlight where uncertainties remain and how these could be addressed. Based on our review, it is clear that there is still much uncertainty with regard to the appropriateness of the assumptions made in the EFSA bat statement. Significantly more information needs to be gathered to answer fundamental questions regarding bat behavior in agricultural landscapes, together with the relative sensitivity of bats to pesticide exposure. Given the current critical information gaps, it is recommended that quantitative risk assessments for bats not be performed for pesticides until more robust, reliable, and relevant data are available. The risk to bats can then be compared with that for birds and ground-dwelling mammals, to determine the protectiveness of the existing scheme and thus whether a bat scenario is indeed required and under what circumstances. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;00:1-12. (c) 2021 Cambridge Environmental Assessments, part of RSK ADAS Ltd. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
引用
收藏
页码:2978 / 2989
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] 2009Authority E.F.S., 2009, EFSA J, V7, P1438, DOI DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2009.1438
  • [2] Diet composition and foraging activity of Pipistrellus pygmaeus in a floodplain forest
    Bartonicka, Tomas
    Rehak, Zdenek
    Andreas, Michal
    [J]. BIOLOGIA, 2008, 63 (02) : 266 - 272
  • [3] Elevated difenacoum metabolism is involved in the difenacoum-resistant phenotype observed in Berkshire rats homozygous for the L120Q mutation in the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (Vkorc1) gene
    Boitet, Maylis
    Hammed, Abdessalem
    Chatron, Nolan
    Debaux, Jean Valery
    Benoit, Etienne
    Lattard, Virginie
    [J]. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 (06) : 1328 - 1334
  • [4] Brooks AC, 2017, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V36, P565, DOI [10.1002/etc.3719, 10.1002/etc]
  • [5] Guidance on dermal absorption
    Buist, Harrie
    Craig, Peter
    Dewhurst, Ian
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Kneuer, Carsten
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Pieper, Christina
    Marques, Daniele Court
    Guillot, Gilles
    Ruffo, Federica
    Chiusolo, Arianna
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (06)
  • [6] DDE IN BROWN AND WHITE FAT OF HIBERNATING BATS
    CLARK, DR
    KRYNITSKY, AJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION SERIES A-ECOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL, 1983, 31 (04): : 287 - 299
  • [8] Crocker D, 2002, PN0908 CENTR SCI LAB
  • [9] HISTOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE WING OF THE GREY-HEADED FLYING-FOX (PTEROPUS-POLIOCEPHALUS) (CHIROPTERA, PTEROPODIDAE)
    CROWLEY, GV
    HALL, LS
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1994, 42 (02) : 215 - 231
  • [10] Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs., 2007, IMPR EST DAILY FOOD