Evaluation of the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning in the Presence of a Magnetic Valve Tissue Expander

被引:10
作者
Trombetta, Debora M. [1 ,2 ]
Cardoso, Simone C. [2 ]
Alves, Victor G. L. [1 ,3 ]
Facure, Alessandro [4 ]
Batista, Delano V. S. [5 ]
da Silva, Ademir X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Nucl Engn Program, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Inst Grad Studies & Res Engn, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Fis, Lab Fis Radiacao Gama, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Inst Nacl Canc, Serv Qualidade Radiacoes Ionizantes, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Comissao Nacl Energia Nucl, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Inst Nacl Canc, Secao Fis Med, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; INTERFACES; PHANTOMS; PERTURBATION; DOSIMETRY; IMPLANTS; METAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0117548
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The combination of radiotherapy treatments and breast reconstruction, using temporary tissue expanders, generates several concerns due to the presence of a magnetic valve inside the radiation field. The objective of this work is to evaluate a radiotherapy treatment planning for a patient using a tissue expander. Isodose curve maps, obtained using radiochromic films, were compared to the ones calculated with two different dose calculation algorithms of the Eclipse radiotherapy Treatment Planning System (TPS), considering the presence or absence of the heterogeneity. The TPS calculation considering the presence of the heterogeneity shows changes around 5% in the isodose curves when they were compared with the calculation without heterogeneity correction. This calculation did not take in account the real density value of the heterogeneity. This limitation was quantified to be around 10% in comparison with the TPS calculation and experimental measurements using the radiochromic film. These results show that the magnetic valve should be taken in account in dose calculations of the TPS. With respect to the AAA and Pencil Beam Convolution algorithms, when the calculation is compared with the real distribution, AAA presents a distribution more similar to experimental dose distribution.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Gafchromic EBT2 dosimetry via robust optimization [J].
Alves, Victor G. L. ;
Cardoso, Simone C. ;
da Silva, Ademir X. .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 184 (07) :1708-1716
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J ICRU
[3]  
Balfour E, 1871, CYCLOPAEDIA INDIA E, V5
[4]  
Bevilacqua V, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4681, P1355
[5]   Clinical implications of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and verification [J].
Bragg, Christopher M. ;
Wingate, Katrina ;
Conway, John .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 86 (02) :276-284
[6]  
Carolan M, 2000, Australas Radiol, V44, P290, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00816.x
[7]   Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities [J].
Carrasco, P. ;
Jornet, N. ;
Duch, M. A. ;
Panettieri, V. ;
Weber, L. ;
Eudaldo, T. ;
Ginjaume, M. ;
Ribas, M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (08) :3323-3333
[8]   Dose perturbation in the radiotherapy of breast cancer patients implanted with the Magna-Site: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Chatzigiannis, Christos ;
Lymperopoulou, Georgia ;
Sandilos, Panagiotis ;
Dardoufas, Constantinos ;
Yakoumakis, Emmanouil ;
Georgiou, Evaggelos ;
Karaiskos, Pantelis .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02) :58-70
[9]   Effect of dental restorations and prostheses on radiotherapy dose distribution: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Chin, David W. H. ;
Treister, Nathaniel ;
Friedland, Bernard ;
Cormack, Robert A. ;
Tishler, Roy B. ;
Makrigiorgos, G. Mike ;
Court, Laurence E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (01) :80-89
[10]   Do metallic ports in tissue expanders affect postmastectomy radiation delivery? [J].
Damast, Shari ;
Beal, Kathryn ;
Ballangrud, Ase ;
Losasso, Thomas J. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Hong, Linda ;
McCormick, Beryl L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (01) :305-310