Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China

被引:122
|
作者
Zhang, Weike [1 ]
Luo, Qian [1 ]
Liu, Shiyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government regulation; Corporate environmental performance (CEP); New Ambient Air Quality Standard (new AAQS); DID; AIR-QUALITY; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN INNOVATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENFORCEMENT; IMPACT; UNCERTAINTY; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Due to the severe air pollution, the Chinese state issued the new Ambient Air Quality Standard (hereafter new AAQS) in 2012, which requires local governments to control pollution and improve air quality. As such, we take that practice as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the effect of government regulation on corporate environmental performance (CEP). We employ the difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct an empirical investigation using Chinese listed enterprises' data from 2008 to 2018. Our findings indicate that the new AAQS significantly promotes the improvement of CEP. However, for enterprises in provinces with less environmental regulatory enforcement and poor environmental information transparency, this effect is weakened. Besides, the influence of the new AAQS reduces when the enterprises are regulated by the government at a greater administrative hierarchical distance to the central state. Our findings offer some critical implications for developing countries to implement government regulation. (C) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 121
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental regulation, corporate environmental disclosure, and firm performance: Evidence from China
    Liu, Jianlei
    Uchida, Konari
    Bao, Chenyu
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 85
  • [2] Government Environmental Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Natural Resource Accountability Audits in China
    Yan, Yingzheng
    Cheng, Qiuwang
    Huang, Menglan
    Lin, Qiaohua
    Lin, Wenhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [3] IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON CORPORATE ESG PERFORMANCE - EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Zhu, Naiping
    Zhang, Siyi
    Zhou, Yueyong
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2023, 26 (03): : 62 - 82
  • [4] Government subsidies and corporate environmental, social and governance performance: Evidence from companies of China
    Peng, Pei
    Sun, Mengzi
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF ECONOMICS, 2024, 19 (03): : 374 - 405
  • [5] Environmental Regulation and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Chinese Carbon Emission Trading Pilot
    Zheng, Lei
    Omori, Akira
    Cao, Jin
    Guo, Xuemeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [6] Do Government Environmental Subsidies Improve Corporate Carbon Performance? Evidence From China
    Luo, Xiying
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (02) : 217 - 242
  • [7] Network infrastructure and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from "Broadband China"
    He, Wenjian
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Miao, Miao
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131
  • [8] Clan culture and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China
    Wei, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Zixiao
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 141
  • [9] Corporate environmental performance, environmental information disclosure, and financial performance: Evidence from China
    Li, Dayuan
    Zhao, Yini
    Sun, Yan
    Yin, Duanjinyu
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 23 (02): : 323 - 339
  • [10] Effects of environmental regulation and corporate environmental commitment: Complementary or alternative? Evidence from China
    Qi, Yu
    Xie, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Xingxing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 423