Exploring the Use of Cytochrome Oxidase c Subunit 1 (COI) for DNA Barcoding of Free-Living Marine Nematodes

被引:188
作者
Derycke, Sofie [1 ,2 ]
Vanaverbeke, Jan [1 ]
Rigaux, Annelien [1 ,2 ]
Backeljau, Thierry [3 ,4 ]
Moens, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, Marine Biol Res Grp, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Ctr Mol Phylogeny & Evolut, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Royal Belgian Inst Nat Sci, Joint Expt Mol Unit, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, Evolutionary Biol Grp, Dept Biol, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
POPULATION GENETIC-STRUCTURE; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; FEEDING ECOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; PSEUDOGENES; WOLBACHIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0013716
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The identification of free-living marine nematodes is difficult because of the paucity of easily scorable diagnostic morphological characters. Consequently, molecular identification tools could solve this problem. Unfortunately, hitherto most of these tools relied on 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA sequences, which often lack sufficient resolution at the species level. In contrast, only a few mitochondrial COI data are available for free-living marine nematodes. Therefore, we investigate the amplification and sequencing success of two partitions of the COI gene, the M1-M6 barcoding region and the I3-M11 partition. Methodology: Both partitions were analysed in 41 nematode species from a wide phylogenetic range. The taxon specific primers for the I3-M11 partition outperformed the universal M1-M6 primers in terms of amplification success (87.8% vs. 65.8%, respectively) and produced a higher number of bidirectional COI sequences (65.8% vs 39.0%, respectively). A threshold value of 5% K2P genetic divergence marked a clear DNA barcoding gap separating intra-and interspecific distances: 99.3% of all interspecific comparisons were >0.05, while 99.5% of all intraspecific comparisons were <0.05 K2P distance. Conclusion: The I3-M11 partition reliably identifies a wide range of marine nematodes, and our data show the need for a strict scrutiny of the obtained sequences, since contamination, nuclear pseudogenes and endosymbionts may confuse nematode species identification by COI sequences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Avise JC., 1994, Natural History and Evolution
[2]  
Awano T, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P2794, DOI [10.1073/pnas.0812297106, 10.1073/pnas.0905845106]
[3]   Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witnesses [J].
Bensasson, D ;
Zhang, DX ;
Hartl, DL ;
Hewitt, GM .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (06) :314-321
[4]   Development and evaluation of a DNA-barcoding approach for the rapid identification of nematodes [J].
Bhadury, Punyasloke ;
Austen, Melanie C. ;
Bilton, David T. ;
Lambshead, P. John D. ;
Rogers, Alex D. ;
Smerdon, Gary R. .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2006, 320 :1-9
[5]   Detection of fungal 18S rRNA sequences in conjunction with marine nematode 18S rRNA amplicons [J].
Bhadury, Punyasloke ;
Bridge, Paul D. ;
Austen, Melanie C. ;
Bilton, David T. ;
Smerdon, Gary R. .
AQUATIC BIOLOGY, 2009, 5 (02) :149-155
[6]   Molecular prospecting for cryptic species of nematodes: mitochondrial DNA versus internal transcribed spacer [J].
Blouin, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 2002, 32 (05) :527-531
[7]  
Bordenstein SR, 2003, J NEMATOL, V35, P266
[8]   GENETIC-VARIANTS WITHIN THE GENUS ECHINOCOCCUS IDENTIFIED BY MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA SEQUENCING [J].
BOWLES, J ;
BLAIR, D ;
MCMANUS, DP .
MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY, 1992, 54 (02) :165-174
[9]   A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes:: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts [J].
Casiraghi, M ;
Anderson, TJC ;
Bandi, C ;
Bazzocchi, C ;
Genchi, C .
PARASITOLOGY, 2001, 122 :93-103
[10]   Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises [J].
Creer, S. ;
Fonseca, V. G. ;
Porazinska, D. L. ;
Giblin-Davis, R. M. ;
Sung, W. ;
Power, D. M. ;
Packer, M. ;
Carvalho, G. R. ;
Blaxter, M. L. ;
Lambshead, P. J. D. ;
Thomas, W. K. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2010, 19 :4-20