Survey of the operational status of twenty-six urban stormwater biofilter facilities in Sweden

被引:25
作者
Beryani, Ali [1 ]
Goldstein, Alisha [2 ]
Al-Rubaei, Ahmed Mohammed [1 ,3 ]
Viklander, Maria [1 ]
Hunt, William F., III [2 ]
Blecken, Godecke-Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Campus Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Technol Baghdad, Dept Bldg & Construct Engn, Baghdad 19006, Iraq
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Bioretention; Operation & maintenance; Stormwater control measures (SCMs); Urban stormwater management; Asset management; BIORETENTION CELLS; PERFORMANCE; INFILTRATION; QUALITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113375
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the operational status of twenty-six biofilter facilities across nine cities in Sweden, with respect to their functional design criteria, engineered design features (filter media composition, hydraulic conductivity, and drawdown time), and includes a visual inspection of the biofilter components (pre-treatment, in/ outlet structures, filter media, and vegetation). These indicators were used to examine the performance level of each biofilter in achieving their design objectives set by the operators. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the biofilter facilities had been properly maintained to meet the objectives. Results indicate that the soil media used was consistent with respect to percentage sand, fines, and organic matter and comparable to design recommendations used by municipalities in other countries. The field-tested hydraulic conductivity for the biofilters ranged from 30 to 962 mm/h. This range of values, along with noticeable sediment accumulation within the biofilter indicate that not all the sites were operating optimally. Pre-treatment stages in poor condition with high volumes of sediment and litter accumulation were the primary causes for, and indicators of, low hydraulic conductivity rates. The ponding volume calculations revealed that at least 40 % of facilities did not have enough capacity to retain every-day and/or design rainfall due to design and/or construction flaws. These analyses raise concerns that, for a considerable number of the biofilters surveyed, water retention and flood protection identified by operators as prioritised objectives are not being met. This raises significant concerns about the functionality of biofilter in practice. Finally, some suggestions are given for tackling the design and maintenance problems discovered.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Al-Rubaei A, 2016, LONG TERM PERFORMANC
  • [2] Comparison of stormwater biofiltration systems in Southeast Australia and Southern California
    Ambrose, Richard F.
    Winfrey, Brandon K.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2015, 2 (02): : 131 - 146
  • [3] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2018, D815218 ASTM ASTM IN
  • [4] Andersson J., 2016, 20160752A SP URB WAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, Stormwater Design Manual
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, The Minnesota Stormwater Manual
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, VEGETATION GUIDELINE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, The SUDS Manual
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2007, STORMWATER BEST MANA
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, ANAGEMENT GUIDEBOOK