Corporate Social Responsibility in Social SMEs: Discourses of Prosocial Behavior in Individual, Organizational, and Societal Levels

被引:3
作者
Myyrylainen, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Torkkeli, Lasse [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] LAB Univ Appl Sci, Lappeenranta Campus, Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
[2] LUT Univ, Sch Engn Sci, Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Turku Sch Econ, Turku 20500, Finland
关键词
social entrepreneurship; SME; corporate social responsibility; discourse analysis; SME internationalization; Finland; ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; CSR; ORIENTATION; PERFORMANCE; ENTERPRISES; FORMS;
D O I
10.3390/su14116718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The past decades have seen an increase in studies on social entrepreneurship, yet its theorization remains underdeveloped. This is especially the case for clarifying how the social mission inherent in social enterprises is related to the social responsibility of traditional businesses, usually understood through corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. The relation between social entrepreneurship and CSR is not unequivocal, as from a theoretical perspective these constructs should be distinct, yet their boundaries both in theory and in practice are still unclear. The literature suggests that it is their social mission that defines social enterprises whereas, for other types of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), CSR activities would be instrumental and motivated by profit maximization. Until now, it has been unclear what the role of CSR in activities and behavior in social enterprises is, which is a notable research gap since social entrepreneurship is an emerging domain of study in business research and practice. This study contributes by illustrating how CSR manifests through prosocial behavior across different levels in social SMEs, thus shedding light on how social entrepreneurs view their motivations towards others-oriented behavior in SMEs. We study the discourses of entrepreneurs who manage mission-driven businesses and social enterprises in Finland, Sweden, Estonia, and Latvia. The perspective can also have implications for SMEs and their strategic positioning of social entrepreneurship and CSR. Viewing social entrepreneurship, CSR, and prosocial motivation as sociopsychological and contextual, constructivist processes sheds light on the multifaceted nature of these phenomena. This discourse study presents a model of how individual, group, organization and societal prosocial motivations co-exist.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Williams, Cynthia A.
    Ganapathi, Jyoti
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 836 - 863
  • [2] Aguinis H., 2011, APA HDB IND ORG PSYC, V3, P855, DOI [10.1037/12171-024, DOI 10.1037/12171-024]
  • [3] What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda
    Aguinis, Herman
    Glavas, Ante
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) : 932 - 968
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00522.x
  • [5] Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?
    Austin, J
    Stevenson, H
    Wei-Skillern, J
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [6] Baker P., 2010, Key Terms in Discourse Analysis
  • [7] Bamberg M., 2007, SELVES IDENTITIES NA
  • [8] Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility
    Barnett, Michael L.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 794 - 816
  • [9] Batson CD, 2011, FRONT SOC PSYCHOL, P103
  • [10] Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?
    Batson, CD
    Polycarpou, MP
    Harmon-Jones, E
    Imhoff, HJ
    Mitchener, EC
    Bednar, LL
    Klein, TR
    Highberger, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (01) : 105 - 118