Education Markets and Schools' Mechanisms of Exclusion: The Case of Chile

被引:17
作者
Zancajo, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
privatization; educational equity; Chile; CHOICE; VOUCHERS; ACHIEVEMENT; COMPETITION; STRATIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; SEGREGATION; INEQUALITY; RESPONSES; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.14507/epaa.27.4318
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Education market advocates frequently argue that socioeconomically disadvantaged students could be the main beneficiaries of privatization and market policies. However, the international evidence has shown how privatization and pro-market policies have a negative impact in terms of equity, which particularly affect socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, increase school segregation and stratification, and foster educational inequalities. The main objective of this paper is to analyze how the responses developed by educational providers in marketized environments especially impact poor populations and can act as mechanisms of exclusion. In this context, Chile is an optimal case study due to the extreme version of privatization and market policies it adopted four decades ago. Based on the case study of two municipalities in Chile, which represent two local education markets, the presented evidence combines in-depth interviews with school principals and families. The paper analyses how schools' responses in the context of a competitive environment produce, among other effects, processes of exclusion affecting students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, foster school segregation and increase educational inequalities. Finally, the paper elaborates on the limits of education markets and privatization policies, as well as market regulation reforms, in providing better educational opportunities to socioeconomically disadvantaged students.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 109 条
  • [1] Winners and losers of school choice: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile
    Alves, Fatima
    Elacqua, Gregory
    Koslinki, Mariane
    Martinez, Matias
    Santos, Humberto
    Urbina, Daniela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 41 : 25 - 34
  • [3] School regimes and education equity: some insights based on PISA 2006
    Angel Alegre, Miquel
    Ferrer, Gerard
    [J]. BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 36 (03) : 433 - 461
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, REP SPEC RAPP RIGHT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, PUBLIC PRIVATE SCH M, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264175006-EN
  • [6] [Anonymous], POLITICAS EDUCACIONA
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2004, REVISI N POL TICAS N, DOI DOI 10.1787/19900198
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, SERIE ESTUDIOS SOCIO
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1933, The theory of monopolistic competition. A re-orientation of the theory of value
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2011, Learning for All Investing in People's Knowledge and Skills to Promote Development