F-18 FDG PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma

被引:26
作者
Ak, I [1 ]
Can, C
机构
[1] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
coincidence PET; F-18FDG; renal cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1080/02841850500335002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the role of F-18 FDG imaging with a dual head coincidence mode gamma camera (Co-PET) in the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with renal masses. Material and Methods: An F-18 FDG Co-PET study was performed in 19 patients (7 F, 12 M; mean age 58.15 +/- 2.5 years, age range 45-79 years) with suspected primary renal tumors based on conventional imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) before nephrectomy or surgical resection of the mass. Results: Histologically documented RCC was present in 15 patients. Of the 19 patients with suspected primary renal tumors, F-18 FDG Co-PET was true-positive in 13, false-negative in 2, true-negative in 3, and false-positive in I patient. Two angiomyolipomas and one renal mass due to infarction and hemorrhage showed a true-negative Co-PET result. The patient with false-positive FDG Co-PET study was diagnosed as xantogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG Co-PET for RCC were 86% (13/15), 75% (3/4), and 84% (16/19), respectively. Positive predictive value for RCC was 92% and negative predictive value 60%. Conclusion: These findings suggest that F-18 FDG Co-PET may have a role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with RCC and primary staging of disease. Positive F-18 FDG study may be predictive of the presence of RCC. However, a negative study does not exclude the RCC.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 899
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in oncology Part II.: The clinical value in detecting and staging primary tumours
    Ak, I
    Stokkel, MPM
    Pauwels, EKJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 126 (10) : 560 - 574
  • [2] Bachor R, 1996, UROLOGE A, V35, P146
  • [3] Comparison of FDG PET and positron coincidence detection imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with 5/8-inch NaI(Tl) crystals in patients with suspected body malignancies
    Boren, EL
    Delbeke, D
    Patton, JA
    Sandler, MP
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (04) : 379 - 387
  • [4] Detecting metastatic pelvic lymph nodes by 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse after treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Chang, CH
    Wu, HC
    Tsai, JJP
    Shen, YY
    Changlai, SP
    Kao, A
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2003, 70 (04) : 311 - 315
  • [5] FDG PET characterization of renal masses: Preliminary experience
    Goldberg, MA
    MayoSmith, WW
    Papanicolaou, N
    Fischman, AJ
    Lee, MJ
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (07) : 510 - 515
  • [6] Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse
    Hain, SF
    O'Doherty, MJ
    Timothy, AR
    Leslie, MD
    Harper, PG
    Huddart, RA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (07) : 863 - 869
  • [7] Hilton S, 2000, SEMIN ONCOL, V27, P150
  • [8] Diagnosis and monitoring of urological tumors using positron emission tomography
    Hofer, C
    Kübler, H
    Hartung, R
    Breul, J
    Avril, N
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (05) : 481 - 487
  • [9] Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Hofer, C
    Laubenbacher, C
    Block, T
    Breul, J
    Hartung, R
    Schwaiger, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [10] Jadvar H, 2003, CLIN NEPHROL, V60, P395