Assessment of a new self-rating scale for posttraumatic stress disorder

被引:739
作者
Davidson, JRT
Book, SW
Colket, JT
Tupler, LA
Roth, S
David, D
Hertzberg, M
Mellman, T
Beckham, JC
Smith, RD
Davison, RM
Katz, R
Feldman, ME
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV, DEPT PSYCHOL, DURHAM, NC 27706 USA
[2] VET ADM MED CTR, DURHAM, NC USA
[3] MED UNIV S CAROLINA, DEPT PSYCHIAT & BEHAV SCI, CHARLESTON, SC 29425 USA
[4] UNIV MIAMI, DEPT PSYCHIAT, MIAMI, FL 33152 USA
[5] CIBA GEIGY PHARMACEUT CORP, SUMMIT, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0033291796004229
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. In post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) there is a need for self-rating scales that are sensitive to treatment effects and have been tested in a broad range of trauma survivors. Separate measures of frequency and severity may also provide an advantage. Methods. Three hundred and fifty-three men and women completed the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), a 17-item scale measuring each DSM-IV symptom of PTSD on 5-point frequency and severity scales. These subjects comprised war veterans, survivors of rape or hurricane and a mixed trauma group participating in a clinical trial. Other scales were included as validity checks as follows: Global ratings, SCL-90-R, Eysenck Scale, Impact of Event Scale and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Results. The scale demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.86), internal consistency (r = 0.99). One main factor emerged for severity and a smaller one for intrusion. In PTSD diagnosed subjects, and the factor structure more closely resembled the traditional grouping of symptoms. Concurrent validity was obtained against the SCID, with a diagnostic accuracy of 83 % at a DTS score of 40. Good convergent and divergent validity was obtained. The DTS showed predictive validity against response to treatment, as well as being sensitive to treatment effects. Conclusions. The DTS showed good reliability and validity, and offers promised as a scale which is particularly suited to assessing symptom severity, treatment outcome and in screening for the likely diagnosis of PTSD.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, Psychological Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.67
  • [2] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1968, Eysenck personality inventory
  • [4] Association AP, 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [5] BALDESSARINI RJ, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P569
  • [6] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE DSM-III CRITERIA FOR POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER - EXPERIENCE WITH A STRUCTURED INTERVIEW
    DAVIDSON, J
    SMITH, R
    KUDLER, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1989, 177 (06) : 336 - 341
  • [7] DAVIDSON JRT, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P1024
  • [8] DEROGATIS LR, 1977, SCL90R ADM SCORING P
  • [9] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A BRIEF INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
    FOA, EB
    RIGGS, DS
    DANCU, CV
    ROTHBAUM, BO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 1993, 6 (04) : 459 - 473
  • [10] GUY W, 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN, P207