Copy number variations in a population with prune belly syndrome

被引:3
作者
Iqbal, Nida S. [1 ]
Jascur, Thomas A. [1 ]
Harrison, Steven [3 ]
Chen, Catherine [1 ,2 ]
Arevalo, Michelle K. [1 ]
Wong, Daniel [1 ]
Sanchez, Emma [2 ]
Grimsby, Gwen [2 ]
Wilson, Kathleen [1 ]
Baker, Linda A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Childrens Hlth, Ctr Pediat Urol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Phoenix Childrens Med Grp, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
copy number variations; genetics; myopathy; prune belly syndrome; urology; MICROCOLON-INTESTINAL HYPOPERISTALSIS; ANGIOTENSIN-II; SIBLINGS; DELETION; ASSOCIATION; PHENOTYPE; MUTATION; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.40476
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Prune Belly Syndrome (PBS) is a congenital multisystem myopathy with mild to lethal severity. While of uncertain etiology, 95% male predominance and familial occurrence suggest a genetic basis. As copy number variations (CNVs) can cause unexplained genetic disorders, we tested for novel CNVs in a large PBS population. We genotyped 21 unrelated PBS patients by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and phenotyped using a novel PBS severity scoring system. Available parents were screened for detected CNV via quantitative PCR (qPCR). We additionally screened for recurrence of identified novel candidate CNVs on 106 PBS probands by qPCR. We identified 10 CNVs in 8 of 21 PBS patients tested (38%). Testing confirmed inheritance from an unaffected biological parent in six patients; parental samples were unavailable in two probands. One candidate CNV includes duplication of the X-chromosome AGTR2 gene, known to function in urinary tract development. Subsequent screening of the larger PBS cohort did not identify any recurrent CNVs. Presence of CNV did not correlate with PBS severity scoring. CNVs were uncommon in this large PBS population, but analysis of identified variants may inform disease pathogenesis and reveal targets for therapeutic intervention for this rare, severe disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:2276 / 2283
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dental treatment of patients with prune belly syndrome
    Quilici, Garrett
    Tolarova, Marie M.
    Quilici, Mary
    Quilici, Diana L.
    SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY, 2023, 43 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [22] Prune belly syndrome and congenital renal neoplasma
    Strauss, A
    Girschick, G
    Fuchshuber, S
    Hasbargen, U
    Müller-Wimbauer, M
    Hepp, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2001, 205 (05): : 195 - 199
  • [23] Modern management of and update on prune belly syndrome
    Lopes, Roberto I.
    Baker, Linda A.
    Denes, Francisco T.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (04) : 548 - 554
  • [24] Prune belly syndrome: A rare case report
    Gyawali, Siddinath
    Gyawali, Balkrishna
    Ghimire, Bhumika
    Shrestha, Bibek
    Khanal, Pratima
    Dahal, Geha Raj
    Koirala, Dinesh Prasad
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 12 (06):
  • [25] Prune Belly Syndrome - diagnosis and therapeutical possibilities
    Leeners, B
    Sauer, I
    Funk, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 1999, 203 (04): : 183 - 186
  • [26] The prune-belly syndrome: Current insights
    Sutherland, RS
    Mevorach, RA
    Kogan, BA
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1995, 9 (06) : 770 - 778
  • [27] Prune belly syndrome and abdominal wall reconstruction
    McEvoy H.C.
    Moss A.L.H.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2006, 29 (4) : 177 - 180
  • [28] Prune belly syndrome lately revealed by hematuria
    Lasry, F
    Khouya, SA
    Oumlil, M
    Khalifa, HH
    Fehri, M
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2004, 11 (03): : 259 - 259
  • [29] MEGALOURETHRA ASSOCIATED WITH PRUNE-BELLY SYNDROME
    GOKALP, A
    GULTEKIN, EY
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1993, 35 (02) : 151 - 153
  • [30] Hepatoblastoma and prune belly syndrome: a potential association
    Brian Becknell
    Priya Pais
    Grace Onimoe
    Hemalatha Rangarajan
    Andrew L. Schwaderer
    Kirk McHugh
    Mark A. Ranalli
    David S. Hains
    Pediatric Nephrology, 2011, 26 : 1269 - 1273