Life cycle cost analysis of energy efficiency design options for refrigerators in Brazil

被引:16
作者
Vendrusculo, Edson Adriano [1 ]
Queiroz, Guilherme de Castilho [2 ]
Jannuzzi, Gilberto de Martino [3 ,4 ]
da Silva Junior, Herculano Xavier [3 ]
Pomilio, Jose Antenor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Packaging Technol Ctr CETEA, BR-13070178 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Mech Engn, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Int Energy Initiat Latin Amer Off, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Electrical consumption; Energy efficiency; Household refrigerator; Life cycle cost analysis; Minimum energy performance standards; Payback period;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-008-9034-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to present the results of a life cycle cost analysis concerning the purchase and operation of a more efficient popular refrigerator model compared with a baseline design in Brazil. The summarized results may be useful for organizations working to promote sustainable energy development. This paper specifically focuses on refrigerators, since their energy consumption is predicted to constitute over 30% of the total average domestic electricity bill in Brazilian households. If all new Brazilian refrigerators had an energy efficiency at the level consistent with the least life cycle cost of ownership, it would result in an annual savings of 2.8 billion dollars (US$) in electricity bills, 45 TWh of electricity demand, and 18 Mt of CO2 emissions, with a respective payback period of 7 years which is less than half the average estimated lifetime of a refrigerator. The analysis was conducted following the guidelines of similar analyses available from the US Department of Energy and the Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 286
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of methodology for life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of asphalt pavements
    Suwarto, Fardzanela
    Parry, Tony
    Airey, Gordon
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2024, 25 (08) : 1631 - 1657
  • [32] Comparing urban wastewater systems in India and Brazil: options for energy efficiency and wastewater reuse
    Never, Babette
    Stepping, Katharina
    WATER POLICY, 2018, 20 (06) : 1129 - 1144
  • [33] Implementing life cycle cost analysis methodology for evaluating agricultural pruning-to-energy initiatives
    Bosona T.
    Gebresenbet G.
    Dyjakon A.
    Bioresource Technology Reports, 2019, 6 : 54 - 62
  • [34] Life cycle energy efficiency evaluation for coal development and utilization
    Wang, Ning
    Shen, Ruifang
    Wen, Zongguo
    De Clercq, Djavan
    ENERGY, 2019, 179 : 1 - 11
  • [35] Determining the life cycle energy efficiency of six biofuel systems in China: A Data Envelopment Analysis
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Tan, Shiyu
    Dong, Lichun
    Mazzi, Anna
    Scipioni, Antonio
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 162 : 1 - 7
  • [36] IMPROVING FACILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY THROUGH ENERGY COST ANALYSIS
    Guo, Qi
    Courville, Adam
    Liu, Qiu
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 7, 2023,
  • [37] Life cycle cost analysis on the operation of power generation
    Sinisuka, Ngapuli
    Nugraha, Herry
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2013, 19 (01) : 5 - +
  • [38] Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Data Center Project
    Wiboonrat, Montri
    2014 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGIES (EVER), 2014,
  • [39] Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Domestic Photovoltaic System
    Ozturk, Murat
    Bozkurt Cirak, Burcu
    Ozek, Nuri
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 18 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [40] Life cycle cost analysis for BESS optimal sizing
    Marchi, Beatrice
    Pasetti, Marco
    Zanoni, Simone
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2016, 2017, 113 : 127 - 134