Effects of acoustic and semantic cues on listening effort during native and non-native speech perception

被引:23
|
作者
Borghini, Giulia [1 ,2 ]
Hazan, Valerie [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Speech Hearing & Phonet Sci, Fac Brain Sci, London WC1N1PF, England
[2] Ist Italiano Tecnol, Cognit Mot & Neurosci Unit, Ctr Human Technol, Via E Melen 83, I-16152 Genoa, Italy
来源
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
CLEAR SPEECH; CONVERSATIONAL SPEECH; PROCESSING LOAD; INTELLIGIBILITY; RECOGNITION; PROFICIENCY; NOISE; REVERBERATION; PUPILLOMETRY; DIFFICULTY;
D O I
10.1121/10.0001126
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Relative to native listeners, non-native listeners who are immersed in a second language environment experience increased listening effort and a reduced ability to successfully perform an additional task while listening. Previous research demonstrated that listeners can exploit a variety of intelligibility-enhancing cues to cope with adverse listening conditions. However, little is known about the implications of those speech perception strategies for listening effort. The current research aims to investigate by means of pupillometry how listening effort is modulated in native and non-native listeners by the availability of semantic context and acoustic enhancements during the comprehension of spoken sentences. For this purpose, semantic plausibility and speaking style were manipulated both separately and in combination during a speech perception task in noise. The signal to noise ratio was individually adjusted for each participant in order to target 50% intelligibility level. Behavioural results indicated that native and non-native listeners were equally able to fruitfully exploit both semantic and acoustic cues to aid their comprehension. Pupil data indicated that listening effort was reduced for both groups of listeners when acoustic enhancements were available, while the presence of a plausible semantic context did not lead to a reduction in listening effort.
引用
收藏
页码:3783 / 3794
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effects of Acoustic and Semantic Enhancements on Perception of Native and Non-Native Speech
    Kato, Misaki
    Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2024, 67 (01) : 40 - 71
  • [2] The impact of speech type on listening effort and intelligibility for native and non-native listeners
    Simantiraki, Olympia
    Wagner, Anita E.
    Cooke, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [3] Does listening to non-native speech impair speech perception?
    Samuel, Arthur G.
    Larraza, Saioa
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2015, 81 : 51 - 71
  • [4] Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents
    Song, Jieun
    Iverson, Paul
    COGNITION, 2018, 179 : 163 - 170
  • [5] NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPEECH PERCEPTION
    Williams, Daniel
    Escudero, Paola
    ACOUSTICS AUSTRALIA, 2014, 42 (02) : 79 - 83
  • [6] Speech intelligibility and listening effort in university classrooms for native and non-native Italian listeners
    Visentin, Chiara
    Prodi, Nicola
    Cappelletti, Francesca
    Torresin, Simone
    Gasparella, Andrea
    BUILDING ACOUSTICS, 2019, 26 (04) : 275 - 291
  • [7] Perception of non-native speech
    Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
    McLaughlin, Drew J.
    McGowan, Kevin B.
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS, 2020, 14 (07):
  • [8] Effects of prosodic cues in non-native perception of personality
    Li, Bin
    Guan, Yihan
    Jangjamras, Jirapat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 250 - 251
  • [9] Relationships Between Native and Non-Native Speech Perception
    Fuhrmeister, Pamela
    Phillips, Matthew C. C.
    McCoach, D. Betsy
    Myers, Emily B. B.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2023, 49 (07) : 1161 - 1175
  • [10] Listening effort and fatigue in native and non-native primary school children
    Brannstrom, K. Jonas
    Rudner, Mary
    Carlie, Johanna
    Sahlen, Birgitta
    Gulz, Agneta
    Andersson, Ketty
    Johansson, Roger
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 210