Analysis and modelling of pseudorange and carrier-phase biases in GNSS Precise Point Positioning

被引:0
|
作者
Aggrey, John [1 ]
Bisnath, Sunil [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Earth & Space Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS 2014) | 2014年
关键词
GLONASS; RESOLUTION; GPS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Unlike GPS, GLONASS observations are affected by the Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) satellite signal structure, which introduces inter-frequency channel biases (ICBs) and other system biases. The effects of these biases are visible in the pseudorange and carrier-phase residuals, which affect GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) convergence period, un-differenced ambiguity resolution and overall positioning accuracy. Current research has shown the correlation between receiver stations from heterogeneous networks, such as the International GNSS Service (IGS), in PPP processing and the increase in magnitude of the pseudorange and carrier-phase ICBs in GLONASS-only PPP solutions. Discounting other system biases which may be present, the correlation is due to mixed receiver and antenna hardware types, differences in firmware versions, and irregularities in the updates of the receiver equipment at the stations. With new and expanding satellite constellations, it is expected that PPP convergence period will decrease due to improved geometry, more observations and stronger signals. However, the inclusion of GLONASS has introduced additional biases that need to be accounted for in the data processing or else this relationship will not hold. So, does the current performance of GLONASS PPP reflect the limits of the processing technique or by accurate modelling of GLONASS biases, can there be improvements in the solution accuracy and reliability? And can the behaviour of the ICBs help mitigate the effect of these biases that compromise the solution integrity of GLONASS PPP? With an increasing number of receiver and antenna hardware types available, the error modelling for the pseudorange and carrier-phase biases becomes more complex. In the GNSS community, there is only a limited understanding of these equipment biases, which introduce varying magnitudes of observable error due to each receiver-antenna combination. A strong correlation between the pseudorange and carrier-phase inter-channel biases and receiver firmware and antennas exists, which relates to the differences that exist in the estimated inter-channel biases and similar firmware of the same receiver types. Currently, there is no standard correction format for PPP users in relation to these biases given a specific receiver firmware or antenna type. This research proposes a possible GLONASS inter-frequency channel bias correction using 350 IGS stations, based on 32 receiver types and 8 antenna types, by observing the unique trends observed in the bias estimates in relation to the GLONASS satellites. Given the unique trends of the inter-channel frequency biases with respect to frequency channels, receiver and antenna types, modelling the pseudorange ICBs show an improvement in the initial convergence period of 20 minutes with a reduction of 13% for GLONASS PPP. While these pseudorange and carrier-phase equipment biases do not cause significant long-term errors on GLONASS PPP positioning results, and have almost no effect on GPS PPP results, they impact initial float ambiguity and associated float covariance estimates. By improving these estimates, more accurate fixed PPP solutions can be produced and more quickly. Further analysis will be done to evaluate the realism of the associated float covariances with bias modelling, and the impact on PPP fixed solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:2512 / 2522
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Noise comparison of triple frequency GNSS carrier phase, doppler and pseudorange observables
    Roberts, Gethin Wyn
    MEASUREMENT, 2019, 144 : 328 - 344
  • [42] Performance Evaluation of Kinematic BDS/GNSS Real-Time Precise Point Positioning for Maritime Positioning
    Yang, Fuxin
    Zhao, Lin
    Li, Liang
    Feng, Shaojun
    Cheng, Jianhua
    JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2019, 72 (01) : 34 - 52
  • [43] Review of code and phase biases in multi-GNSS positioning
    Hakansson, Martin
    Jensen, Anna B. O.
    Horemuz, Milan
    Hedling, Gunnar
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2017, 21 (03) : 849 - 860
  • [44] GLONASS Precise Point Positioning Considering the Influence of Code Inter-Frequency Biases
    Pan, Zongpeng
    Chai, Hongzhou
    Chong, Yang
    Kong, Yulong
    Wang, Rui
    Pan, Xiaodong
    2017 FORUM ON COOPERATIVE POSITIONING AND SERVICE (CPGPS), 2017, : 208 - 212
  • [45] An analytical study on the carrier-phase linear combinations for triple-frequency GNSS
    Li, Jinlong
    Yang, Yuanxi
    He, Haibo
    Guo, Hairong
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2017, 91 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [46] Analysis of Characteristics for Inter-System Bias on Multi-GNSS Undifferenced and Uncombined Precise Point Positioning
    Lu, Yangyang
    Yang, Hu
    Li, Bo
    Li, Jun
    Xu, Aigong
    Zhang, Mingze
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [47] Assessment of BeiDou-3 and Multi-GNSS Precise Point Positioning Performance
    Jiao, Guoqiang
    Song, Shuli
    Ge, Yulong
    Su, Ke
    Liu, Yangyang
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (11):
  • [48] Weighting of Multi-GNSS Observations in Real-Time Precise Point Positioning
    Kazmierski, Kamil
    Hadas, Tomasz
    Sosnica, Krzysztof
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [49] An evaluation of real-time troposphere estimation based on GNSS Precise Point Positioning
    Ding, Wenwu
    Teferle, Felix Norman
    Kazmierski, Kamil
    Laurichesse, Denis
    Yuan, Yunbin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (05) : 2779 - 2790
  • [50] Performance analysis of precise point positioning using multi-constellation GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou
    Abd Rabbou, M.
    El-Rabbany, A.
    SURVEY REVIEW, 2017, 49 (352) : 39 - 50