A comparison of the diagnostic utility of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio versus PlGF alone for the detection of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome

Objective: The Elecsys((R)) immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and the Triage((R)) PlGF assay were compared (in a prospective, multicenter, case-control study) for diagnosis of preeclampsia/hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. Methods: Women in European perinatal care centers with singleton pregnancies were enrolled: 178 cases had confirmed preeclampsia and 391 controls had normal outcome. Patients in the preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome group were matched pairwise by gestational week to healthy controls (1:2). Maternal blood samples were analyzed using (a) fully automated Elecsys PlGF and Elecsys sFlt-1 immunoassays with two cutoffs (early-onset [<34 weeks] 33, 85; late-onset [34 weeks] 33, 110), and (b) Triage PlGF immunoassay (single cutoff). Diagnostic performance and utility were assessed. Results: Respectively, 83 and 95 women had early-onset or late-onset preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome. The overall diagnostic performance of the Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (area under the curve [AUC] 0.941) was higher than for Triage PlGF (AUC 0.917). The Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio sensitivity and specificity was: 94.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.5-98.0) and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.8-99.9) for early-onset preeclampsia; and 89.5% (95% CI: 81.5-94.8) and 95.4% (95% CI: 91.7-97.8) for late-onset preeclampsia. The Triage assay sensitivity and specificity was: 96.4% (95% CI: 89.8-99.3) and 88.5% (95% CI: 82.8-92.8) (early-onset); and 90.5% (95% CI: 83-96) and 64.5% (95% CI: 57.8-70.9) (late onset). Conclusions: The fully automated Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio provides improved diagnostic utility over the Triage PlGF assay with improved specificity for the clinical management of pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome.