Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults

被引:33
|
作者
Daffner, KR [1 ]
Ryan, KK
Williams, DM
Budson, AE
Rentz, DM
Scinto, LFM
Holcomb, PJ
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Brigham Behav Neurol Grp,Div Cognit & Behav Neuro, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
aging; P3; ERPs; novelty; target; cognitively high performing; cognitive reserve;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.11.007
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Previous research on a-e-related changes in ERP components in response to novel and target stimuli has not carefully controlled for differences in level of cognitive status between age groups, which may have contributed to the common findings of increased P3 latency, decreased P3 amplitude, and altered P3 scalp distribution. Here, cognitively high-performing (top third based on published norms) old, middle-aged. and young adults matched for IQ, education, and gender participated in a novelty oddball paradigm. There were no age-associated differences in P3 latency. Older adults had a larger, more anteriorly distributed P3 amplitude to all stimulus types, even repetitive standards, suggesting they may rely on increased resources and effortful frontal activity to successfully process any kind of visual stimulus. However, after controlling for this non-specific age-related processing difference, the amplitude and scalp distribution of the P3 component to novel and target stimuli were comparable across age groups, indicating that for cognitively high functioning elders there may be no age-related differences specific to the processing of novel and target events as indexed by the P3 component. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1295
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Age-related differences in the automatic processing of single letters: implications for selective attention
    Daffner, Kirk R.
    Alperin, Brittany R.
    Mott, Katherine K.
    Holcomb, Phillip J.
    NEUROREPORT, 2014, 25 (02) : 77 - 82
  • [42] Age-related differences in timing with breaks
    Bherer, Louis
    Desjardins, Samuel
    Fortin, Claudette
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2007, 22 (02) : 398 - 403
  • [43] Age-related differences in proprioceptive asymmetries
    Acosta-Sojo, Yadrianna
    Martin, Bernard J.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2021, 757
  • [44] Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: Evidence from event-related potentials
    Vallesi, Antonino
    Stuss, Donald T.
    McIntosh, Anthony R.
    Picton, Terence W.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (02) : 577 - 586
  • [45] Age-Related Perspectives and Emotion Processing
    Lynchard, Nicholas A.
    Radvansky, Gabriel A.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (04) : 934 - 939
  • [46] Anti-inflammatory drugs reduce age-related decreases in brain volume in cognitively normal older adults
    Walther, K.
    Bendlin, B. B.
    Glisky, E. L.
    Trouard, T. P.
    Lisse, J. R.
    Posever, J. O.
    Ryan, L.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2011, 32 (03) : 497 - 505
  • [47] Are age-related changes in cognitive function driven by age-related changes in sensory processing?
    Larry E. Humes
    Thomas A. Busey
    James Craig
    Diane Kewley-Port
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 : 508 - 524
  • [48] Are age-related changes in cognitive function driven by age-related changes in sensory processing?
    Humes, Larry E.
    Busey, Thomas A.
    Craig, James
    Kewley-Port, Diane
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (03) : 508 - 524
  • [49] Executive functioning and processing speed in age-related differences in memory: Contribution of a coding task
    Baudouin, Alexia
    Clarys, David
    Vanneste, Sandrine
    Isingrini, Michel
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2009, 71 (03) : 240 - 245
  • [50] Age-Related Differences in Brain Morphology and the Modifiers in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
    Zhao, Lu
    Matloff, William
    Ning, Kaida
    Kim, Hosung
    Dinov, Ivo D.
    Toga, Arthur W.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2019, 29 (10) : 4169 - 4193