Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries

被引:26
作者
de Freitas, Hayley M. [1 ]
Ito, Tetsuro [2 ]
Hadi, Monica [1 ]
Al-Jassar, Gemma [1 ]
Henry-Szatkowski, Mickael [1 ]
Nafees, Beenish [3 ]
Lloyd, Andrew J. [4 ]
机构
[1] An Icon Plc Co, Patient Centered Outcomes, Mapi, London, England
[2] Hlth Econ & Market Access EMEA, High Wycombe, Bucks, England
[3] Nafees Consulting Ltd, London, England
[4] Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, London, England
关键词
Abiraterone acetate; Discrete choice experiment; Preference; Prostate cancer; ELICITING PREFERENCES; CARE; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionVarious treatment options are available for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. This study aimed to quantify how men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and Spain perceive the risks and benefits of hypothetical abiraterone acetate plus prednisone treatment and docetaxel-based chemotherapy treatment options.MethodsA targeted literature review, exploratory interviews with prostate cancer patients and oncologists, and pre-test interviews were used to develop a discrete choice experiments (DCE). The final DCE included 32 choice sets, selected using a main-effects orthogonal design, divided into two survey blocks. Paired profiles presented hypothetical treatments for prostate cancer through six attributes that could be presented at two or four levels each. Preference estimates were estimated using a conditional logit regression model. Preference results were stratified by cancer stage.ResultsA total of 152 participants (mean age 69years) completed the DCE in the UK, Germany, and Spain. Treatment effectiveness was the main concern for the patients (difference in preference estimates between 8 and 32months 1.443). Participants wanted to avoid pain that was not well controlled (preference dummy coding estimate - 1.157). Participants valued a change from an oral medication to an intravenous treatment (change in preference estimate - 0.416) more negatively than a change from a 1% to a 5% risk of infection (change in preference estimate - 0.313).ConclusionsThis study shows that treatment effectiveness and pain control were the most important attributes for patients with prostate cancer. These two attributes influenced more than 50% of their decision-making in this study. The risk of fatigue and mode of administration were least prioritised by patients. This study highlights the relative importance that Spanish, German, and British patients place on various aspects of treatment options for prostate cancer. Understanding patient preference and taking them into consideration shall help physicians when developing their treatment strategies for their patients.FundingJanssen.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 332
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Mohamed, Ateesha F. ;
Finnern, Henrik W. ;
Woehl, Anette ;
Hauber, A. Brett .
LUNG CANCER, 2012, 77 (01) :224-231
[2]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[3]   Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature [J].
Clark, Michael D. ;
Determann, Domino ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Moro, Domenico ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :883-902
[4]   Patients' and urologists' preferences for prostate cancer treatment: a discrete choice experiment [J].
de Bekker-Grob, E. W. ;
Bliemer, M. C. J. ;
Donkers, B. ;
Essink-Bot, M-L ;
Korfage, I. J. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Bangma, C. H. ;
Steyerberg, E. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (03) :633-640
[5]   Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature [J].
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ;
Ryan, Mandy ;
Gerard, Karen .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) :145-172
[6]   Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment [J].
Eliasson, Lina ;
de Freitas, Hayley M. ;
Dearden, Lindsay ;
Calimlim, Brian ;
Lloyd, Andrew J. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (04) :723-737
[7]  
Ferlay J., 2013, GLOBOCAN 2012 CANC I
[8]   Abiraterone plus Prednisone in Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer [J].
Fizazi, Karim ;
NamPhuong Tran ;
Fein, Luis ;
Matsubara, Nobuaki ;
Rodriguez-Antolin, Alfredo ;
Alekseev, Boris Y. ;
Ozguroglu, Mustafa ;
Ye, Dingwei ;
Feyerabend, Susan ;
Protheroe, Andrew ;
De Porre, Peter ;
Kheoh, Thian ;
Park, Youn C. ;
Todd, Mary B. ;
Chi, Kim N. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (04) :352-360
[9]   Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force [J].
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Gonzalez, Juan Marcos ;
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M. ;
Prior, Thomas ;
Marshall, Deborah A. ;
Cunningham, Charles ;
Ijzerman, Maarten J. ;
Bridges, John F. P. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) :300-315
[10]   Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial [J].
James, Nicholas D. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Clarke, Noel W. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Spears, Melissa R. ;
Ritchie, Alastair W. S. ;
Parker, Christopher C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Attard, Gerhardt ;
de Bono, Johann ;
Cross, William ;
Jones, Rob J. ;
Thalmann, George ;
Amos, Claire ;
Matheson, David ;
Millman, Robin ;
Alzouebi, Mymoona ;
Beesley, Sharon ;
Birtle, Alison J. ;
Brock, Susannah ;
Cathomas, Richard ;
Chakraborti, Prabir ;
Chowdhury, Simon ;
Cook, Audrey ;
Elliott, Tony ;
Gale, Joanna ;
Gibbs, Stephanie ;
Graham, John D. ;
Hetherington, John ;
Hughes, Robert ;
Laing, Robert ;
McKinna, Fiona ;
McLaren, Duncan B. ;
O'Sullivan, Joe M. ;
Parikh, Omi ;
Peedell, Clive ;
Protheroe, Andrew ;
Robinson, Angus J. ;
Srihari, Narayanan ;
Srinivasan, Rajaguru ;
Staffurth, John ;
Sundar, Santhanam ;
Tolan, Shaun ;
Tsang, David ;
Wagstaff, John ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET, 2016, 387 (10024) :1163-1177