Hard and Soft Euroscepticism in the European Parliament

被引:4
作者
Kaniok, Petr [1 ]
Kominkova, Magda [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Dept Int Relat & European Studies, Jostova 10, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
关键词
OPPOSITION; QUESTIONS; UNION; EU;
D O I
10.1017/S1062798720001088
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Euroscepticism has become a stable component of the European Parliament. But is there one distinct Euroscepticism in the European Parliament or do various types exist there? Departing from the widely accepted definitions of hard and soft Euroscepticism, we analysed the behaviour of Eurosceptical groups in the European Parliament in order to assess how they differ. Using data from parliamentary questions, we argue that there are substantial differences between these two groups. This suggests that hard and soft Euroscepticisms do not represent different degrees of one phenomenon, but instead refer to two fundamentally different stances towards European integration.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 95
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Flood C., 2007, EUSA 10 BIENN INT C
[22]  
Fuchs D., 2009, EUROSCEPTICISM IMAGE
[23]   Parliamentary Opposition and its Alternatives in a Transnational Regime: The European Union in Perspective [J].
Helms, Ludger .
JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES, 2008, 14 (1-2) :212-235
[24]   A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus [J].
Hooghe, Liesbet ;
Marks, Gary .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 39 :1-23
[25]  
Ionescu Ghita., 1968, OPPOSITION PRESENT P
[26]   Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status inthe European Parliament [J].
Jensen, Christian B. ;
Proksch, Sven-Oliver ;
Slapin, Jonathan B. .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2013, 38 (02) :259-282
[27]  
Judge David., 2008, The European Parliament, VSecond
[28]  
Kaniok P., 2019, CONTESTATION EU ENLA, V1st Edn, P133
[29]  
Kaniok P., 2018, European Politics and Society, V19, P507, DOI 10.1080/23745118.2018.1463841
[30]  
Kaniok P, 2012, ROM J POLIT SCI, V12, P29