The DNA Binding Diversity of the SIX Homeodomain Transcription Factor Family

被引:0
|
作者
Barreto, Anthony R. Rivera
Papa, Riccardo
Hoffmann, Federico
Martinez, Jose A. Rodriguez
机构
[1] Biology, University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras Campus, PRSan Juan
[2] University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras Campus, PRSan Juan
来源
FASEB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 36卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R6185
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Transcription factor (TF) DNA-binding specificity is determined by how their DNA-binding domain (DBD) interacts with DNA. TFs are identified by the sequence homology shared with described DBDs, which allows them to be classified into families. It is highly widely accepted that similar DBDs recognize similar DNA motifs. However, changes in a TF can lead to changes in its DNA recognition. TFs are critical for development and have been found since the beginning of animals, how their DNA binding changes through time has not been fully studied. TFs members of the sine oculis homeobox (SIX) homeodomain family are found from sponges to humans and are considered atypical members of the homeodomain family. They regulate numerous developmental processes, with phenotypic features spanning from eye development in flies, red color patterning in Heliconius butterfly wings to brain development in humans. How evolutionary related TFs diversify their function has not been fully understood, especially changes to their DNA binding specificity. Using full length SIX proteins from Drosophila melanogaster, Heliconius erato, and Homo sapiens, we performed in vitro Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX-seq) to identify the DNA binding specificity. Our preliminary data shows the majority bind to their canonical binding motif (TGATAC), except for six4 members which prefer TGACAC. Interestingly, the way they bind to these motifs differs. Both sine oculis and six4 homologs require a 5'-GA flanking the core motif. While optix related members prefer a shorter flaking region with less dependence on 5'-GA. This is interesting since optix is more evolutionarily related to six4 than to sine oculis. In addition, we found that Heliconius erato optix can bind both as a homodimer with a preferred spacing of 2-bp between binding sites or as a monomer. Our results provide new insights in the binding diversity found in the SIX family of TFs and predict genomic targets of these understudied TF family. © FASEB.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Insights into structural and functional diversity of Dof (DNA binding with one finger) transcription factor
    S. Gupta
    N. Malviya
    H. Kushwaha
    J. Nasim
    N. C. Bisht
    V. K. Singh
    D. Yadav
    Planta, 2015, 241 : 549 - 562
  • [22] Diversity, expansion, and evolutionary novelty of plant DNA-binding transcription factor families
    Lehti-Shiu, Melissa D.
    Panchy, Nicholas
    Wang, Peipei
    Uygun, Sahra
    Shiu, Shin-Han
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS, 2017, 1860 (01): : 3 - 20
  • [23] Cooperative dimerization increases DNA binding affinity of the homeodomain-containing transcription factor Csx/Nkx2.5
    Kasahara, H
    Usheva, A
    Horikoshi, N
    Izumo, S
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 354 - 355
  • [24] Structural Characterization of the Homeodomain Transcription Factor Gsx2 Bound to DNA
    Webb, Jordan
    Kolb, Ellie
    Kovall, Rhett
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2021, 77 : A261 - A261
  • [25] DNA recognition mechanism of the ONECUT homeodomain of transcription factor HNF-6
    Iyaguchi, Daisuke
    Yao, Min
    Watanabe, Nobuhisa
    Nishihira, Jun
    Tanaka, Isao
    STRUCTURE, 2007, 15 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [26] Diversity, Phylogeny and Expression Patterns of Pou and Six Homeodomain Transcription Factors in Hydrozoan Jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbyi
    Hroudova, Miluse
    Vojta, Petr
    Strnad, Hynek
    Krejcik, Zdenek
    Ridl, Jakub
    Paces, Jan
    Vlcek, Cestmir
    Paces, Vaclav
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [27] The Genetics of Transcription Factor DNA Binding Variation
    Deplancke, Bart
    Alpern, Daniel
    Gardeux, Vincent
    CELL, 2016, 166 (03) : 538 - 554
  • [28] Evolution of transcription factor DNA binding sites
    Kotelnikova, EA
    Makeev, VJ
    Gelfand, MS
    GENE, 2005, 347 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [29] DNA binding properties of the transcription factor optix
    Rodriguez, Jessica Marie
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (01):
  • [30] TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STRUCTURE AND DNA-BINDING
    WOLBERGER, C
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 3 (01) : 3 - 10