What's the cost-effective pattern for rural wastewater treatment?

被引:26
作者
Huang, Yuansheng [1 ]
Wu, Lizhou [2 ]
Li, Peng [1 ]
Li, Nanke [3 ]
He, Yiliang [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Enjoy Environm Protect Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Guangzi Int Engn Investment Consultants, Guangzhou 510091, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China UK Low Carbon Coll, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Rural wastewater treatment; Cost-effective pattern; Modelling; Impact factor; Degree of decentralization; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114226
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Inadequate sanitation infrastructure is a global problem that is particularly impacting rural areas. And decentralized wastewater management system is considered as the feasible solution for rural sewage treatment (RuST). However, determining the cost-effective (CE) pattern for decentralized RuST is methodologically challenging because of scarce decision-support tools. In this research, a RuST optimization model (RuST-OM) was developed to gain an insight into the CE pattern of RuST based on the greedy algorithm. This model involves tradeoffs in the economy-of-scale and technology of wastewater treatment system versus the cost and energy consumption of the sewage collection system. The investment associated with the CE pattern for RuST is closely linked to the environmental demand, RuST coverage, topographic complexity, and degree of household dispersion. The cost of the CE pattern falls between the onsite-B and community-based pattern, and this range represents the optimized interval for RuST planning. Nature-based technology is a sustainable alternative for RuST in areas characterized by low or moderate environmental demand. To ensure applicability of the RuST-OM in other countries/regions, built-in datasets (e.g., technology and pipeline design parameters) are designed based on rural area features that can be modified as necessary. This research highlights the utility of the CE pattern for RuST planning, and can serve as a reference for RuST planning around the world.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Revitalize the world's countryside [J].
Liu, Yansui ;
Li, Yuheng .
NATURE, 2017, 548 (7667) :275-277
[32]   Review of Dry and Wet Decentralized Sanitation Technologies for Rural Areas: Applicability, Challenges and Opportunities [J].
Lourenco, N. ;
Nunes, L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 65 (05) :642-664
[33]   The structure and pattern of rurality in Nigeria [J].
Madu, Ignatius Ani .
GEOJOURNAL, 2010, 75 (02) :175-184
[34]   Decentralised wastewater treatment technologies from a national perspective: at what cost are they competitive? [J].
Maurer, M ;
Rothenberger, D ;
Larsen, TA .
Water Economics, Statistics and Finance, 2005, 5 (06) :145-154
[35]  
NAOC, 2018, 2 NAOC
[36]   Enhancing anaerobic digestion for rural wastewater treatment with granular activated carbon (GAC) supplementation [J].
Park, Jeong-Hoon ;
Park, Jong-Hun ;
Lee, Sang-Hoon ;
Jung, Sokhee P. ;
Kim, Sang-Hyoun .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 315
[37]   A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output [J].
Saltelli, A ;
Tarantola, S ;
Chan, KPS .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1999, 41 (01) :39-56
[38]   Quantifying landscape ruggedness for animal habitat analysis: A case study using bighorn sheep in the Mojave Desert [J].
Sappington, J. Mark ;
Longshore, Kathleen M. ;
Thompson, Daniel B. .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (05) :1419-1426
[39]  
UN, 2019, 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects, DOI DOI 10.18356/3405D09F-EN
[40]  
[UNICEF/WHO] United Nations Children's Fund World Health Organization), 2020, STAT WORLDS SAN URG