Catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation versus anticoagulation alone in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis - a meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Du, Guo-Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Mao-Chun [3 ]
Zhao, Ji-Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, West China Hosp, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchong Centrary Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Diagnost Ultrasound Obstet & Gynecol, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep vein thrombosis; catheter-directed thrombolysis; anticoagulation; meta-analysis; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; VALVE FUNCTION; THERAPY; EFFICACY; PREVENTION; QUALITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1024/0301-1526/a000430
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) plus anticoagulation with anticoagulation alone in patients with lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients and methods: We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October, 2014. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies comparing the clinical outcomes between additional CDT and anticoagulation alone were included. The primary outcomes were postthrombotic syndrome and major bleeding complications. The secondary outcomes included the iliofemoral patency rate, deep venous function, mortality, pulmonary embolism, and recurrent DVT. Results: Three RCTs and 3 non-randomized studies were included. Compared with standard anticoagulation treatment, additional CDT was associated with a significantly higher rate of complete lysis within 30 days (OR = 91; 95% CI 19.28 to 429.46), a higher rate of 6-month patency (OR = 5.77; 95% CI 1.99 to 16.73), a lower rate of postthrombotic syndrome (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.96), and a lower rate of venous obstruction (OR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.44). More major bleeding episodes occurred in the CDT group (Peto OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.62 to 2.62). CDT was not found to reduce mortality, pulmonary embolism, or recurrent DVT. Conclusions: Additional CDT therapy appeared to be more effective than standard anticoagulation treatment in improving the venous patency and preventing venous obstruction and postthrombotic syndrome. Caution should be taken when performing CDT given the increased risk of major bleeding. However, no evidence supported benefits of CDT in reducing mortality, recurrent DVT, or pulmonary embolism.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life after catheter-directed thrombolysis and standard anticoagulation for iliofemoral deep-vein thrombosis
    Sebastian, Jithin Jagan
    Ayyappan, M. K.
    Pawar, Pranay
    Mathur, Kapil
    Raju, Radhakrishnan
    Rajendra, Naveen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 6 (04) : 274 - 277
  • [22] Catheter-directed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for the management of deep vein thrombosis
    Klopotowski, Mariusz
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2011, 7 (04): : 311 - 316
  • [23] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Saunders, J. H.
    Arya, P. H.
    Abisi, S.
    Yong, Y. P.
    MacSweeney, S.
    Braithwaite, B.
    Altaf, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (08) : 1025 - 1029
  • [24] Catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy with selective endovascular stenting as alternatives to systemic anticoagulation for treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis
    Jackson, LSM
    Wang, XJ
    Dudrick, SJ
    Gersten, GD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (06) : 864 - 868
  • [25] A comparison of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulation alone in the prevention of postthrombotic syndrome following acute lower limb deep-vein thrombosis
    Sharma, Nikhil
    Bedi, V. S.
    Agarwal, Sandeep
    Yadav, Ajay
    Satwik, Ambarish
    Agarwal, Dhruv
    Srivastava, Apurva
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 6 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [26] Catheter-directed Thrombolysis versus Systemic Anticoagulation for Sub-massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis
    Siordia, Juan Arturo
    Kaur, Amanpreet
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [27] The case for catheter-directed thrombolysis in selected patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis
    Chiasakul, Thita
    Cuker, Adam
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2018, 2 (14) : 1799 - 1802
  • [28] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Along with Mechanical Thromboaspiration versus Anticoagulation Alone in the Management of Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis-A Comparative Study
    Srinivas, B. C.
    Patra, Soumya
    Nagesh, C. M.
    Reddy, Babu
    Manjunath, C. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (04) : 247 - 253
  • [29] Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Kang, Tao
    Lu, Yao-Liang
    Han, Song
    Li, Xiao-Qiang
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [30] Catheter-directed thrombolysis of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: A prospective trial with venographic and clinical follow-up
    Manninen, Hannu
    Juutilainen, Auni
    Kaukanen, Erkki
    Lehto, Seppo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (06) : 1197 - 1202