Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions

被引:420
作者
Peters, Nicky H. G. M. [1 ,3 ]
Rinkes, Inne H. M. Borel [2 ]
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A. [3 ]
Mali, Willem P. T. M. [1 ]
Moons, Karel G. M. [3 ]
Peeters, Petra H. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Pharm Care, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2461061298
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine, in a meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Studies to assess the diagnostic performance of MR imaging in patients suspected of having breast cancer who underwent MR imaging and biopsy from January 1985 through March 2005 were reviewed for inclusion. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using the recently developed bivariate approach for diagnostic meta-analysis. Results: Of 251 eligible studies, 44 were included in the metaanalysis (sample size range, 14-821; cancer prevalence, 23%-84%). Pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.88, 0.92) and 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 0.77), respectively. The performance of breast MR imaging was influenced by the prevalence of cancer in the studied population (P = .05) and by whether two criteria (ie, morphology, enhancement, and kinetic enhancement pattern) versus one or three criteria-were used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions (P = .02). Conclusion: MR imaging of the breast has high sensitivity and lower specificity in the evaluation of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[21]   BREAST MR-IMAGING WITH COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES - RADIOLOGIC-PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
FOBBEN, ES ;
RUBIN, CZ ;
KALISHER, L ;
DEMBNER, AG ;
SELTZER, MH ;
SANTORO, EJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (01) :143-152
[22]   Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Liney, GP ;
Lowry, M ;
Kneeshaw, PJ ;
Turnbull, LW .
BREAST, 2004, 13 (02) :115-121
[23]   Clustered breast microcalcifications: Evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI [J].
Gilles, R ;
Meunier, M ;
Lucidarme, O ;
Zafrani, B ;
Guinebretiere, JM ;
Tardivon, AA ;
LeGal, M ;
Vanel, D ;
Neuenschwander, S ;
Arriagada, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (01) :9-14
[24]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135
[25]   MR-IMAGING OF THE BREAST WITH ROTATING DELIVERY OF EXCITATION OFF RESONANCE - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
HARMS, SE ;
FLAMIG, DP ;
HESLEY, KL ;
MEICHES, MD ;
JENSEN, RA ;
EVANS, WP ;
SAVINO, DA ;
WELLS, RV .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :493-501
[26]   Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast [J].
Heiberg, EV ;
Perman, WH ;
Herrmann, VM ;
Janney, CG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (04) :337-348
[27]   Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions [J].
Heinisch, M ;
Gallowitsch, HJ ;
Mikosch, P ;
Kresnik, E ;
Kumnig, G ;
Gomez, I ;
Lind, P ;
Umschaden, HW ;
Gasser, J ;
Forsthuber, EP .
BREAST, 2003, 12 (01) :17-22
[28]   Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: MR imaging versus Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography [J].
Helbich, TH ;
Becherer, A ;
Trattnig, S ;
Leitha, T ;
Kelkar, P ;
Seifert, M ;
Gnant, M ;
Staudenherz, A ;
Rudas, M ;
Wolf, G ;
Mostbeck, GH .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (02) :421-429
[29]   FACTORS AFFECTING SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY - MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS [J].
HLATKY, MA ;
PRYOR, DB ;
HARRELL, FE ;
CALIFF, RM ;
MARK, DB ;
ROSATI, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 77 (01) :64-71
[30]   Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR imaging [J].
Hlawatsch, A ;
Teifke, A ;
Schmidt, M ;
Thelen, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (06) :1493-1501