A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro

被引:111
作者
Gueth, Jan-Frederik [1 ]
Edelhoff, Daniel [1 ]
Schweiger, Josef [1 ]
Keul, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Goethestr 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
Full-arch scan; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner; Accuracy; CAD/CAM; Digital workflow; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; 3-DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; RESTORATIONS; CHAIRSIDE; TIME; PARAMETERS; PRECISION; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introducing a new approach to evaluate the accuracy of digital impression methods for full-arch scans, avoiding "best-fit alignment." A lower jaw model with a straight metal bar between the second molars of both quadrants was directly digitized using an intraoral scanner (True Definition, TRD, n = 12) and indirectly digitized (D810, CON, n = 12) after impression and plaster cast. A dataset of the bar from a coordinate measuring machine served as reference (REF). Datasets obtained from test groups were analyzed using inspection software to determine the aberration of the bar length, the linear shift (in X-, Y-, Z-axis) and the angle deviation (alpha (overall), alpha (coronal), alpha (horizontal)) caused by the digitalization method. Mann-Whitney U and unpaired two-sample Student's t test were implemented to detect differences. The level of significance was set at 5 %. Concerning the bar length, no significant differences were found between groups. In view of the linear shift, CON showed significantly higher values than TRD in Y-axis (p = 0.003) and in Z-axis (p = 0.040). Regarding the angle measurement, TRD showed significant smaller values than CON for alpha (overall) (p = 0.006) and for alpha (coronal) (p = 0.005). This in vitro study shows that intraoral scanning systems seem to show the same or even higher accuracy than the conventional impression with subsequent indirect digitalization. Intraoral scanners have proven excellent accuracy for single teeth or small spans. However, insufficient data is available about their accuracy for full-arch scans. The presented new approach seems to be suitable to precisely analyze differences in the accuracy of different digitalization methods without using best-fit alignment.
引用
收藏
页码:1487 / 1494
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Al-Bakri I A, 2007, J Clin Dent, V18, P29
[2]  
[Anonymous], ISO 5725-1:1994 accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions
[3]   INFLUENCE OF PROLONGED SETTING TIME ON PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIALS [J].
Balkenhol, Markus ;
Haunschild, Sylvia ;
Erbe, Christina ;
Woestmann, Bernd .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 103 (05) :288-294
[4]   Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations [J].
Beuer, F. ;
Schweiger, J. ;
Edelhoff, D. .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2008, 204 (09) :505-511
[5]   Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients [J].
Boeddinghaus, Moritz ;
Breloer, Eva Sabina ;
Rehmann, Peter ;
Woestmann, Bernd .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (08) :2027-2034
[6]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF CHAIRSIDE CAD/CAM MILLING PROCESSES [J].
Bosch, Gabriel ;
Ender, Andreas ;
Mehl, Albert .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (06) :1425-1431
[7]  
Chandran DT, 2010, BIO-MED MATER ENG, V20, P243, DOI 10.3233/BME-2010-0638
[8]   Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? [J].
Christensen, Gordon J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 139 (06) :761-763
[9]   The challenge to conventional impressions [J].
Christensen, Gordon J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 139 (03) :347-349
[10]  
Ender A, 2013, INT J COMPUT DENT, V16, P11