Diabetes and fractures: new evidence of atypical femoral fractures?

被引:18
|
作者
Rasmussen, N. H. [1 ]
Dal, J. [2 ]
de Vries, F. [3 ,4 ]
van den Bergh, J. P. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Jensen, M. H. [1 ]
Vestergaard, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Steno Diabet Ctr North, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Maastricht UMC, Dept Clin Pharm & Toxicol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] VieCuri Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Venlo, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht UMC, Dept Internal Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Hasselt, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Atypical femoral fractures; Diabetes type 1; Diabetes type 2; Femoral shaft fracture; Fractures; Subtrochanteric fracture; BISPHOSPHONATE USE; FEMUR FRACTURES; RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TYPE-1; METAANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; BENEFITS; MELLITUS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-019-05224-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of fractures. In this study, subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were increased in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with the general population. In the light of this, more evidence points towards an association between diabetes and atypical femoral fractures. Introduction Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of femoral fractures, but little is known about the risk of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). The aim of this study was to identify the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft (ST/FS) fractures and estimate the risk of AFFs in patients with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods From the nationwide Danish National Patient Register, we identified patients with T1D (n = 19,896), T2D (n = 312,188), and sex- and aged-matched controls without diabetes (n = 996,252) from the general population and all ST/FS fractures (n = 7509). Data were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model and the incidence rate and rate ratio of ST/FS fractures were estimated. Results The incidence rate of ST/FS fractures in T1D was 52.14 events per 100,000 person years and 73.21 per 100,000 person years in T2D. T1D was associated with an increased risk of ST/FS (HR 2.07 (95% CI 1.68-2.56)), whereas T2D was not (HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.10)). Previous ST/FS fractures were associated with an increased risk of subsequent ST/FS fractures (HR 6.95 (95% CI 6.00-8.05)) and the use of bisphosphonates with an increased risk of ST/FS fractures (HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.54-1.91)). Conclusion Patients with T1D have a higher risk of ST/FS fractures compared with sex- and age-matched controls. Since a proportion of ST/FS fractures are classified as AFFs, this could point towards the fact that AFFs also are increased in patients with T1D, but not T2D.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 455
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diabetes and fractures: new evidence of atypical femoral fractures?
    N.H. Rasmussen
    J. Dal
    F. de Vries
    J.P. van den Bergh
    M.H. Jensen
    P. Vestergaard
    Osteoporosis International, 2020, 31 : 447 - 455
  • [2] Update on Atypical Femoral Fractures
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Kates, Stephen L.
    Watts, Nelson B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (19) : 1819 - 1828
  • [3] Atypical femoral fractures and current management
    Zheng, Nianye
    Tang, Ning
    Qin, Ling
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2016, 7 : 7 - 22
  • [4] Bisphosphonates and atypical femoral fractures
    Adler, Robert A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2016, 23 (06) : 430 - 434
  • [5] Atypical femoral fractures
    Giannini, Sandro
    Chiarello, Eugenio
    Tedesco, Giuseppe
    Cadossi, Matteo
    Luciani, Deianira
    Mazzotti, Antonio
    Donati, Davide Maria
    CLINICAL CASES IN MINERAL AND BONE METABOLISM, 2013, 10 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [6] The clinical characteristics of patients with hip fractures in typical locations and atypical femoral fractures
    Velasco, Soledad
    Kim, Sandra
    Bleakney, Robert
    Jamal, Sophie A.
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2014, 9 (01)
  • [7] The definition of atypical femoral fractures should include periprosthetic femoral fractures (PAFFs)
    Makkar, Binni
    Obremskey, William
    Avidano, Ryan
    Ott, Susan
    Basida, Brinda
    Hoffer, Colton
    Schousboe, John T.
    Lo, Joan
    Huling, Jared
    Ristau, Kim
    Fink, Howard A.
    Adler, Robert A.
    Barzilay, Joshua I.
    Carbone, Laura
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 36 (03) : 539 - 546
  • [8] Atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures—new aspects
    Frieda Feldman
    Skeletal Radiology, 2012, 41 : 75 - 81
  • [9] Atypical Femoral fractures: A Review of the Literature
    Desai, Pingal A.
    Vyas, Parth A.
    Lane, Joseph M.
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2013, 11 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [10] Atypical femoral fractures in bisphosphonate therapy
    Ballaschk, A.
    Kalaitzis, N.
    Roepke, M.
    Piatek, S.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2015, 118 (01): : 88 - 91