共 70 条
Effects of environmental regulation on rural livelihood diversification: Evidence from pastoral China
被引:8
作者:
Qiu, Huanguang
[1
]
Su, Liufang
[2
]
Tang, Jianjun
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, 59 Zhongguancun Ave, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Cash transfer;
Livelihood diversification index;
Latent class analysis;
Seemingly unrelated regression;
Tobit model;
Impact evaluation;
LAND CONVERSION PROGRAM;
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;
CASH TRANSFERS;
HOUSEHOLD INCOME;
PRODUCTIVE IMPACTS;
STRATEGIES;
DETERMINANTS;
PROTECTION;
COMMUNITIES;
PATHWAYS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.008
中图分类号:
P9 [自然地理学];
K9 [地理];
学科分类号:
0705 ;
070501 ;
摘要:
Previous studies on rural livelihood diversification primarily focused on its determinants and the role of cash transfers. However, little attention has been paid to the effects of environmental regulation schemes on rural livelihood diversification. This study ascertains the impact of China's Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) on the income-generating activities and livelihood diversification of its rural recipients. We use a unique national representative survey of 722 herder households in pastoral China. A seemingly unrelated Tobit model is estimated to simultaneously account for the censored nature of the livelihood diversification of recipients and the correlation of error terms of the different livelihood activities. A latent class cluster analysis is performed to split samples into four clusters according to the characteristics of their livelihood strategies. We find a U-shaped relationship between livelihood diversification and GECP subsidies, such that the livelihood diversification index (excluding cash transfers) decreases or increases when the GECP subsidy is below or above 89,500 yuan, respectively. The present compensation levels are far below the turning point, implying that the scheme fails to achieve its objective of diversifying herders' livelihoods into off-farm sectors. Further, the herders' livelihood diversification index increased when cash transfers were included but decreased when they were excluded, reflecting the vulnerability of herders' livelihoods and their strong reliance on the compensation. Finally, the sub-group analysis reveals that cash transfers only influence the livelihood diversification of full-time, but not part-time, pastoralist households.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文