Traditional knowledge, social capital, and community response to a disaster: resilience of remote communities in Fiji after a severe climatic event
被引:29
|
作者:
Nakamura, Naohiro
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Pacific, Fac Sci Technol & Environm, Sch Geog Earth Sci & Environm, Laucala Campus, Suva, FijiUniv South Pacific, Fac Sci Technol & Environm, Sch Geog Earth Sci & Environm, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
Nakamura, Naohiro
[1
]
Kanemasu, Yoko
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Pacific, Fac Arts Law & Educ, Sch Social Sci, Laucala Campus, Suva, FijiUniv South Pacific, Fac Sci Technol & Environm, Sch Geog Earth Sci & Environm, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
Kanemasu, Yoko
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ South Pacific, Fac Sci Technol & Environm, Sch Geog Earth Sci & Environm, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
[2] Univ South Pacific, Fac Arts Law & Educ, Sch Social Sci, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji
Community resilience;
Disaster;
Cyclone;
Traditional knowledge;
Social capital;
Fiji;
INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE;
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY;
RURAL COMMUNITIES;
CHANGE ADAPTATION;
RISK REDUCTION;
ISLAND;
VULNERABILITY;
FRAMEWORK;
HURRICANE;
RECOVERY;
D O I:
10.1007/s10113-020-01613-w
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
This article examines responses by four remote communities in Fiji to the extensive damage caused by Tropical Cyclone Winston (TCW) of 2016, differences among these communities, and factors that make a particular community more disaster-resilient than others. In Fiji, traditional knowledge of climate and disaster mitigation has been known to contribute to better disaster management resilience by communities. TCW of 2016 is one of the strongest cyclones that have struck the islands of Fiji, and many of its remote communities were severely damaged. Responses to the damage caused by TCW varied from community to community, and resilience was shown to depend on the availability of traditional knowledge of climate and disaster mitigation as well as the effective mobilization of social capital exhibited in the long-standing tradition in Fijian villages of mutual help within the community. Our findings suggest that communities without such resources are often left out in recovery processes and may be in particular need of support.