The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery

被引:10
作者
Vargas, Christina R. [1 ]
Chuang, Danielle J. [1 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA USA
关键词
mastopexy; online resources; readability; risks and benefits; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; HEALTH INFORMATION; PATIENT RESOURCES; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL MEDIA; SATISFACTION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background As more patients use Internet resources for health information, there is increasing interest in evaluating the readability of available online materials. The National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend that patient educational content be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study evaluates the most popular online resources for information about mastopexy relative to average adult literacy in the United States. Methods The 12 most popular sites returned by the largest Internet search engine were identified using the search term breast lift surgery. Relevant articles from the main sites were downloaded and formatted into text documents. Pictures, captions, links, and references were excluded. The readability of these 100 articles was analyzed overall and subsequently by site using 10 established readability tests. Subgroup analysis was performed for articles discussing the benefits of surgery and those focusing on risks. Results The overall average readability of online patient information was 13.3 (range, 11.1-15). There was a range of average readability scores overall across the 12 sites from 8.9 to 16.1, suggesting that some may be more appropriate than others for patient demographics with different health literacy levels. Subgroup analysis revealed that articles discussing the risks of mastopexy were significantly harder to read (mean, 14.1) than articles about benefits (11.6). Conclusions Patient-directed articles from the most popular online resources for mastopexy information are uniformly above the recommended reading level and likely too difficult to be understood by a large number of patients in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readability of Online Foot and Ankle Surgery Patient Education Materials
    Hartnett, Davis A.
    Philips, Alexander P.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Blankenhorn, Brad D.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2025, 18 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [42] Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials
    Patel, Chirag R.
    Cherla, Deepa V.
    Sanghvi, Saurin
    Baredes, Soly
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (10): : 1421 - 1425
  • [43] The Readability, Understandability, and Suitability of Online Resources for Ostomy Care
    Ficarino, Hannah
    Moses, Cara
    Wood, Lauren
    Byrd, Gabby
    Bhatia, Smita
    Chu, Daniel
    Hollis, Robert
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2024, 51 (06) : 471 - 477
  • [44] Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
    Foster, Brian K.
    Callahan, Clarice
    Dwyer, C. Liam
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [45] The Readability of Online Patient Resources for Skin Cancer Treatment
    Thomas Dobbs
    Giles Neal
    Hayley A. Hutchings
    Iain S. Whitaker
    James Milton
    Oncology and Therapy, 2017, 5 (2) : 149 - 160
  • [46] The Importance of Readability: A Guide to Understanding Alopecia Areata through Multilingual Online Resources
    Skrzypczak, Tomasz
    Skrzypczak, Anna
    Szepietowski, Jacek C.
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2024, 104
  • [47] Evaluation of the Content, Quality, and Readability of Patient Accessible Online Resources Regarding Cataracts
    Patel, Annika J.
    Kloosterboer, Amy
    Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
    Venkateswaran, Nandini
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 36 (5-6) : 384 - 391
  • [48] The Quality and Readability of Online Consumer Information About Gynecologic Cancer
    Sobota, Aleksandra
    Ozakinci, Gozde
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (03) : 537 - 541
  • [49] Online information on dysmenorrhoea: An evaluation of readability, credibility, quality and usability
    Lovett, Jordan
    Gordon, Candice
    Patton, Shelby
    Chen, Chen X.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (19-20) : 3590 - 3598
  • [50] Readability Trends of Online Information by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation
    Wong, Kevin
    Levi, Jessica R.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 156 (01) : 96 - 102