The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery

被引:10
|
作者
Vargas, Christina R. [1 ]
Chuang, Danielle J. [1 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA USA
关键词
mastopexy; online resources; readability; risks and benefits; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; HEALTH INFORMATION; PATIENT RESOURCES; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL MEDIA; SATISFACTION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000000340
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background As more patients use Internet resources for health information, there is increasing interest in evaluating the readability of available online materials. The National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend that patient educational content be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study evaluates the most popular online resources for information about mastopexy relative to average adult literacy in the United States. Methods The 12 most popular sites returned by the largest Internet search engine were identified using the search term breast lift surgery. Relevant articles from the main sites were downloaded and formatted into text documents. Pictures, captions, links, and references were excluded. The readability of these 100 articles was analyzed overall and subsequently by site using 10 established readability tests. Subgroup analysis was performed for articles discussing the benefits of surgery and those focusing on risks. Results The overall average readability of online patient information was 13.3 (range, 11.1-15). There was a range of average readability scores overall across the 12 sites from 8.9 to 16.1, suggesting that some may be more appropriate than others for patient demographics with different health literacy levels. Subgroup analysis revealed that articles discussing the risks of mastopexy were significantly harder to read (mean, 14.1) than articles about benefits (11.6). Conclusions Patient-directed articles from the most popular online resources for mastopexy information are uniformly above the recommended reading level and likely too difficult to be understood by a large number of patients in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readability of online patient resources for melanoma
    Ibrahim, Ahmed M. S.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [2] The accessibility, readability, and quality of online resources for gender affirming surgery
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Lee, Michelle
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Medalie, Daniel A.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 217 : 198 - 206
  • [3] Online Patient Resources for Gender Affirmation Surgery An Analysis of Readability
    Kiwanuka, Elizabeth
    Mehrzad, Raman
    Prsic, Adnan
    Kwan, Daniel
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 79 (04) : 329 - 333
  • [4] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources
    Phillips, Nicole A.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 39 (01) : 147 - 153
  • [5] Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer
    Weiss, Kathleen D.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Ho, Olivia A.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Weiss, Jonathan
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 206 (01) : 90 - 97
  • [6] Readability, complexity, and suitability of online resources for mastectomy and lumpectomy
    Tran, Bao Ngoc N.
    Singh, Mansher
    Singhal, Dhruv
    Rudd, Rima
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 212 : 214 - 221
  • [7] Online Patient Resources for Liposuction A Comparative Analysis of Readability
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [8] The readability of online health resources for phenylketonuria
    Marsh, Jessie M.
    Dobbs, Thomas D.
    Hutchings, Hayley A.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2020, 11 (04) : 451 - 459
  • [9] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Resources for Breast Augmentation Surgery
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (06) : 1573 - 1579
  • [10] Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources
    Luciani, A. Michael
    Foster, Brian K.
    Hayes, Daniel
    DelSole, Edward M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E640 - E644