Accuracy of a patient-specific template for pedicle screw placement compared with a conventional method: a meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Fan, Yong [1 ]
Du, Jin-Peng [1 ]
Wu, Qi-Ning [1 ]
Zhang, Jia-Nan [1 ]
Hao, Ding-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Honghui Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Friendship East Rd, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Patient-specific template; Free hand; Accuracy; Pedicle screw; DRILL GUIDE TEMPLATE; ASSISTED ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; INDIVIDUAL TEMPLATES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; SPINE; NAVIGATION; OPERATION; SCOLIOSIS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-017-2815-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate placement of pedicle screws in spine surgery is a challenge for surgeons. Patient-specific template techniques have the potential for improving the accuracy of screw placement. The target of this analysis was to investigate differences in terms of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between patient-specific template assistance and the conventional free-hand method for reconstruction of spinal stability. The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and CNKI database were searched until February 2017 for a systematic review, and several comparative studies were screened for comparisons of accuracies of pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific assistance and conventional methods. Primary outcomes extracted from papers that met the selection criterion were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi (2) test and I (2) statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. A total of ten RCTs and two prospective cohort studies were finally chosen for the analysis of accuracy rates. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. There were obvious differences between them, and the accuracy rate of screw implantation among a patient-specific template assistance set was statistically significantly higher than the conventional free-hand set (OR 95% CI 3.78-6.41, P < 0.01); in vitro: OR 95% CI 3.93-7.42, P < 0.01; in vivo: OR 95% CI 2.49-6.44, P < 0.01. The template-assisted technique is superior to the conventional method for the reduction of pedicle violation. The template-assisted technique is a promising technique that should be considered as another available navigation tool for surgeons to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. As an available technique for emerging applications in spine surgeries, this technique will face challenges but ultimately prove successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:1641 / 1649
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review
    Aoude, Ahmed A.
    Fortin, Maryse
    Figueiredo, Rainer
    Jarzem, Peter
    Ouellet, Jean
    Weber, Michael H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (05) : 990 - 1004
  • [2] Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method
    Birnbaum, K
    Schkommodau, E
    Decker, N
    Prescher, A
    Klapper, U
    Radermacher, K
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (04) : 365 - 369
  • [3] Chen YB, 2010, CHIN J CLIN BASIC OR, V2, P125
  • [4] Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study
    Farshad, Mazda
    Betz, Michael
    Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
    Moser, Manuel
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (03) : 738 - 749
  • [5] Individualized 3D printing navigation template for pedicle screw fixation in upper cervical spine
    Guo, Fei
    Dai, Jianhao
    Zhang, Junxiang
    Ma, Yichuan
    Zhu, Guanghui
    Shen, Junjie
    Niu, Guoqi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [6] A comparative study on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by personalized rapid prototyping template between pre- and post-operation in patients with relatively normal mid-upper thoracic spine
    Hu, Yong
    Yuan, Zhen-shan
    Spiker, William Ryan
    Dong, Wei-xin
    Sun, Xiao-yang
    Yuan, Jian-bing
    Zhang, Jiao
    Zhu, Bingke
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (06) : 1706 - 1715
  • [7] Infection in the operating room
    Hughes, SPF
    Anderson, FM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05): : 754 - 755
  • [8] Preventing Instrumentation Failure in Three-Column Spinal Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis of Rod Configuration
    Jager Z.S.
    Inceoʇlu S.
    Palmer D.
    Akpolat Y.T.
    Cheng W.K.
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (1) : 3 - 9
  • [9] Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery - Comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Abumi, Kuniyoshi
    Ito, Manabu
    Takahata, Masahiko
    Sudo, Hideki
    Ohshima, Shigeki
    Minami, Akio
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (14) : 1543 - 1550
  • [10] Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis Clinical article
    Lau, Darryl
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Patel, Rakesh
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (04) : 356 - 361