The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent

被引:377
作者
Mariette, Christophe [1 ,2 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,2 ]
Briez, Nicolas [1 ]
Triboulet, Jean Pierre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHRU, Univ Hosp Claude Huriez, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, F-59037 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille 2, Div Med, Lille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate whether the number of lymph nodes metastasis (LNMs) and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (LNs) are better prognostic factors when compared with traditional staging systems in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Summary Background Data: The accuracy of the 6th UICC/TNM classification is suboptimal, especially when not taking into account neoadjuvant therapy and lymphadenectomy extent. Methods: For 536 patients who underwent curative en bloc esophagectomy, in whom 51.5% (n = 276) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, LNMs were classified according to the 6th UICC/TNM classification and systems based on the number (<= 4 and > 4) or the ratio (<= 0.2 and > 0.2) of LNMs. Survival of the respective stages, predictors of survival, and influence of both chemoradiation and number of examined LNs were studied. Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year survival rates were 47% for the entire population, significantly poorer for patients with > 4 LNMs (8% vs. 53%, P < 0.001) or a ratio of LNMs > 0.2 (22% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding variables, a number of LNMs > 4 and a ratio of LNMs > 0.2 were the only predictors of poor prognosis. The prognostic role of both the number and the ratio of LNMs was maintained whether patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation or not. Moreover, LN ratio is shown to be more accurate for inadequately staged patients (< 15 examined LNs), whereas the number of LNMs is pertinent for adequately staged patients (>= 15 examined LNs). Conclusion: Staging systems for esophageal cancer that use the number (<= 4 or > 4) and the ratio (<= 0.2 or > 0.2) of LNMs have greater prognostic importance than the current staging systems because of the good stratification of the groups and their clinical utility, taking into account neoadjuvant therapy and lymphadenectomy extent.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma? [J].
Altorki, N ;
Skinner, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (05) :581-587
[2]   Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study - JCOG9204 [J].
Ando, N ;
Iizuka, T ;
Ide, H ;
Ishida, K ;
Shinoda, M ;
Nishimaki, T ;
Takiyama, W ;
Watanabe, H ;
Isono, K ;
Aoyama, N ;
Makuuchi, H ;
Tanaka, O ;
Yamana, H ;
Ikeuchi, S ;
Kabuto, T ;
Nagai, K ;
Shimoda, Y ;
Kinjo, Y .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (24) :4592-4596
[3]   Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes [J].
Berger, AC ;
Sigurdson, ER ;
LeVoyer, T ;
Hanlon, A ;
Mayer, RJ ;
Macdonald, JS ;
Catalano, PJ ;
Haller, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8706-8712
[4]   Transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: standard versus extended two-field mediastinal lymphadenectomy? [J].
D'Journo, XB ;
Doddoli, C ;
Michelet, P ;
Loundou, A ;
Trousse, D ;
Giudicelli, R ;
Fuentes, PA ;
Thomas, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 27 (04) :697-703
[5]  
DeMeester TR, 1997, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V13, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199707/08)13:4<217::AID-SSU2>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-8
[7]   The prognostic significance of lymph node size in patients with squamous esophageal cancer [J].
Dhar, DK ;
Tachibana, M ;
Kinukawa, N ;
Riruke, M ;
Kohno, H ;
Little, AG ;
Nagasue, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (10) :1010-1016
[8]   STAGING OF CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA - A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT STAGING CRITERIA [J].
ELLIS, FH ;
WATKINS, E ;
KRASNA, MJ ;
HEATLEY, GJ ;
BALOGH, K .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 52 (04) :231-235
[9]   Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the US - The importance of tumor length and lymph node status [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Desmond, R ;
Arguedas, MR ;
Reed, CE ;
Wilcox, CM .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (07) :1434-1443
[10]   MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY RATES, POSTOPERATIVE COURSE, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, AND PROGNOSIS AFTER EXTENDED RADICAL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - COMPARISON OF 3-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY WITH 2-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY [J].
FUJITA, H ;
KAKEGAWA, T ;
YAMANA, H ;
SHIMA, I ;
TOH, Y ;
TOMITA, Y ;
FUJII, T ;
YAMASAKI, K ;
HIGAKI, K ;
NOAKE, T ;
ISHIBASHI, N ;
MIZUTANI, K .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (05) :654-662