Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography: diagnostic performance and effect on recall rates versus digital mammography in category O

被引:0
作者
Emlik, Ganime Dilek [1 ]
Poyraz, Necdet [1 ]
Altunkeser, Aysegul [2 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2017年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
Screening mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; ultrasonography; diagnostic performance; recall rates; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic performance and screening recall rates of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound (US) added to digital mammography (DM) in the category O. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained. The additional breast US and DBT performed 216 women categorized as BI-RADS category O according to screening DM between January 2014 and February 2015. A total of 22 women that previously underwent breast surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy were excluded. Finally 194 patients were enrolled in this study. The DM+DBT images and DM+DBT images with US images of patients were independently reviewed by three breast radiologists and than recategorized according to BI-RADS category. Among 194 lesions, 165 (85%) were benign and 29 (14.9%) were malign. DBT reduced recall rate by 70%. For DBT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, 48%, 99%, and 84%, whereas for US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 93%, 79%, 47%, 98%, and 81%, respectively. AUC value was 0.89 and 0.86 for DBT and US. In conclusion, DBT reduced recall rates. DBT showed better diagnostic performance than breast US for category O. Reduction in RR was independent from breast parenchymal patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:10668 / 10675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ryoko Ohashi
    Michinobu Nagao
    Izumi Nakamura
    Takahiro Okamoto
    Shuji Sakai
    Breast Cancer, 2018, 25 : 590 - 596
  • [42] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Chao You
    Yunyan Zhang
    Yajia Gu
    Qin Xiao
    Guangyu Liu
    Xigang Shen
    Wentao Yang
    Weijun Peng
    Breast Cancer, 2020, 27 : 47 - 53
  • [43] Breast Digital Tomosynthesis versus Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Comparison of Diagnostic Application and Radiation Dose in a Screening Setting
    Nicosia, Luca
    Bozzini, Anna Carla
    Pesapane, Filippo
    Rotili, Anna
    Marinucci, Irene
    Signorelli, Giulia
    Frassoni, Samuele
    Bagnardi, Vincenzo
    Origgi, Daniela
    De Marco, Paolo
    Abiuso, Ida
    Sangalli, Claudia
    Balestreri, Nicola
    Corso, Giovanni
    Cassano, Enrico
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [44] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Olinder, Jakob
    Johnson, Kristin
    Akesson, Anna
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [45] Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction
    Endo, Tokiko
    Morita, Takako
    Oiwa, Mikinao
    Suda, Namiko
    Sato, Yasuyuki
    Ichihara, Shu
    Shiraiwa, Misaki
    Yoshikawa, Kazuaki
    Horiba, Takao
    Ogawa, Hirotoshi
    Hayashi, Yukie
    Sendai, Tomonari
    Arai, Takahisa
    BREAST CANCER, 2018, 25 (02) : 159 - 166
  • [46] Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction
    Tokiko Endo
    Takako Morita
    Mikinao Oiwa
    Namiko Suda
    Yasuyuki Sato
    Shu Ichihara
    Misaki Shiraiwa
    Kazuaki Yoshikawa
    Takao Horiba
    Hirotoshi Ogawa
    Yukie Hayashi
    Tomonari Sendai
    Takahisa Arai
    Breast Cancer, 2018, 25 : 159 - 166
  • [47] Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Alper, Emily
    Khorasani, Ramin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (04) : 929 - 934
  • [48] Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Coley, Rebecca Yates
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Lee, Janie M.
    Herschorn, Sally
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Rauscher, Garth
    Lee, Christoph, I
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (07)
  • [49] Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography
    Giovanna Romanucci
    Sara Mercogliano
    Elisabetta Carucci
    Alessandro Cina
    Elisa Zantedeschi
    Andrea Caneva
    Chiara Benassuti
    Francesca Fornasa
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 768 - 773
  • [50] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Maynard, A. Stanley
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 10