Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography: diagnostic performance and effect on recall rates versus digital mammography in category O

被引:0
作者
Emlik, Ganime Dilek [1 ]
Poyraz, Necdet [1 ]
Altunkeser, Aysegul [2 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2017年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
Screening mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; ultrasonography; diagnostic performance; recall rates; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic performance and screening recall rates of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound (US) added to digital mammography (DM) in the category O. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained. The additional breast US and DBT performed 216 women categorized as BI-RADS category O according to screening DM between January 2014 and February 2015. A total of 22 women that previously underwent breast surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy were excluded. Finally 194 patients were enrolled in this study. The DM+DBT images and DM+DBT images with US images of patients were independently reviewed by three breast radiologists and than recategorized according to BI-RADS category. Among 194 lesions, 165 (85%) were benign and 29 (14.9%) were malign. DBT reduced recall rate by 70%. For DBT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, 48%, 99%, and 84%, whereas for US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 93%, 79%, 47%, 98%, and 81%, respectively. AUC value was 0.89 and 0.86 for DBT and US. In conclusion, DBT reduced recall rates. DBT showed better diagnostic performance than breast US for category O. Reduction in RR was independent from breast parenchymal patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:10668 / 10675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography
    Lee, Won Kyung
    Chung, Jin
    Cha, Eun-Suk
    Lee, Jee Eun
    Kim, Jeoung Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (01) : 291 - 296
  • [2] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [3] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers
    Nam, Kyung Jin
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Ko, Eun Young
    Jeong, Dong Wook
    Choo, Ki Seok
    BREAST, 2015, 24 (05) : 649 - 655
  • [4] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [5] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
    Gisella Gennaro
    Alicia Toledano
    Cosimo di Maggio
    Enrica Baldan
    Elisabetta Bezzon
    Manuela La Grassa
    Luigi Pescarini
    Ilaria Polico
    Alessandro Proietti
    Aida Toffoli
    Pier Carlo Muzzio
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 1545 - 1553
  • [6] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Toledano, Alicia
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    Baldan, Enrica
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    La Grassa, Manuela
    Pescarini, Luigi
    Polico, Ilaria
    Proietti, Alessandro
    Toffoli, Aida
    Muzzio, Pier Carlo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) : 1545 - 1553
  • [7] Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ohashi, Ryoko
    Nagao, Michinobu
    Nakamura, Izumi
    Okamoto, Takahiro
    Sakai, Shuji
    BREAST CANCER, 2018, 25 (05) : 590 - 596
  • [8] Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Akhtar, Amana L.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (05) : 1143 - 1148
  • [9] The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Tucker, Lorraine
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Willsher, Paula
    Cooke, Julie
    Duncan, Karen A.
    Michell, Michael J.
    Dobson, Hilary M.
    Lim, Yit Yoong
    Purushothaman, Hema
    Strudley, Celia
    Astley, Susan M.
    Morrish, Oliver
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (04) : 1 - +
  • [10] Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade
    Kim, Geunwon
    Mikhael, Peter G.
    Oseni, Tawakalitu O.
    Bahl, Manisha
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) : 6089 - 6098