Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers

被引:75
|
作者
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
Inciardi, Marc F. [2 ]
Edwards, Alexandra [1 ]
Papaioannou, John [1 ]
Drukker, Karen [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei [1 ]
Brem, Rachel [3 ]
Brown, Jeremy Bancroft [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, 5841 S Maryland Ave,MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
breast imaging; screening; ultrasound; whole-breast ultrasound; RISK; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MULTIREADER; POPULATION; MORTALITY; ROC; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.15367
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess and compare, in a reader study, radiologists' performance in the detection of breast cancer using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone and using FFDM with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this multireader, multicase, sequential-design reader study, 17 Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists interpreted a cancer-enriched set of FFDM and ABUS examinations. All imaging studies were of asymptomatic women with BI-RADS C or D breast density. Readers first interpreted FFDM alone and subsequently interpreted FFDM combined with ABUS. The analysis included 185 cases: 133 noncancers and 52 biopsy-proven cancers. Of the 52 cancer cases, the screening FFDM images were interpreted as showing BI-RADS 1 or 2 findings in 31 cases and BI-RADS 0 findings in 21 cases. For the cases interpreted as BI-RADS 0, a forced BI-RADS score was also given. Reader performance was compared in terms of AUC under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS. The AUC was 0.72 for FFDM alone and 0.82 for FFDM combined with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 14% relative improvement in AUC (i.e., change in AUC = 0.10 [95% CI, 0.07-0.14]; p < 0.001). When a cutpoint of BI-RADS 3 was used, the sensitivity across all readers was 57.5% for FFDM alone and 74.1% for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant increase in sensitivity (p < 0.001) (relative increase = 29%). Overall specificity was 78.1% for FFDM alone and 76.1% for FFDM with ABUS (p = 0.496). For only the mammography-negative cancers, the average AUC was 0.60 for FFDM alone and 0.75 for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 25% relative improvement in AUC with the addition of ABUS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Combining mammography with ABUS, compared with mammography alone, significantly improved readers' detection of breast cancers in women with dense breast tissue without substantially affecting specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1350
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography
    Lee, Won Kyung
    Chung, Jin
    Cha, Eun-Suk
    Lee, Jee Eun
    Kim, Jeoung Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (01) : 291 - 296
  • [42] Breast cancer detection: Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts
    Hadadi, I.
    Rae, W.
    Clarke, J.
    McEntee, M.
    Ekpo, E.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (04) : 1027 - 1032
  • [43] Follow-up interval for probably benign breast lesions on screening ultrasound in women at average risk for breast cancer with dense breasts
    Moon, Hee Jung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (09) : 1045 - 1050
  • [44] Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Turner, Robin M.
    BREAST, 2016, 30 : 141 - 145
  • [45] Automated breast ultrasound: Supplemental screening for average-risk women with dense breasts
    Spear, Georgia Giakoumis
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 76 : 15 - 25
  • [46] Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study
    Skaane, Per
    Gullien, Randi
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Sandhaug, Merete
    Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger
    Stoeblen, Frank
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (04) : 404 - 412
  • [47] Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts
    Kwon, Mi-ri
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Lee, Mi Yeon
    Kim, Sinae
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Ko, Eun Young
    Han, Boo Kyung
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (04)
  • [48] Application of Breast Ultrasound in a Mammography-Based Chinese Breast Screening Study
    Ji Ya-jie
    Peng Wei-jun
    Chang Cai
    Ding Jian-hui
    Zeng Wei
    Chen Min
    Liu Guang-yu
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2013, 65 : 37 - 41
  • [49] Impact of Screening Mammography on Treatment in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer
    Ahn, Soojin
    Wooster, Margaux
    Valente, Christopher
    Moshier, Erin
    Meng, Ru
    Pisapati, Kereeti
    Couri, Ronald
    Margolies, Laurie
    Schmidt, Hank
    Port, Elisa
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2979 - 2986
  • [50] Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Women With Dense Breasts
    Miller, Matthew M.
    Ganti, Ramapriya
    Repich, Kathy
    Patrie, James T.
    Anderson, Roger T.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (02) : 125 - 134