Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers

被引:75
|
作者
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
Inciardi, Marc F. [2 ]
Edwards, Alexandra [1 ]
Papaioannou, John [1 ]
Drukker, Karen [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei [1 ]
Brem, Rachel [3 ]
Brown, Jeremy Bancroft [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, 5841 S Maryland Ave,MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
breast imaging; screening; ultrasound; whole-breast ultrasound; RISK; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MULTIREADER; POPULATION; MORTALITY; ROC; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.15367
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess and compare, in a reader study, radiologists' performance in the detection of breast cancer using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone and using FFDM with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this multireader, multicase, sequential-design reader study, 17 Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists interpreted a cancer-enriched set of FFDM and ABUS examinations. All imaging studies were of asymptomatic women with BI-RADS C or D breast density. Readers first interpreted FFDM alone and subsequently interpreted FFDM combined with ABUS. The analysis included 185 cases: 133 noncancers and 52 biopsy-proven cancers. Of the 52 cancer cases, the screening FFDM images were interpreted as showing BI-RADS 1 or 2 findings in 31 cases and BI-RADS 0 findings in 21 cases. For the cases interpreted as BI-RADS 0, a forced BI-RADS score was also given. Reader performance was compared in terms of AUC under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS. The AUC was 0.72 for FFDM alone and 0.82 for FFDM combined with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 14% relative improvement in AUC (i.e., change in AUC = 0.10 [95% CI, 0.07-0.14]; p < 0.001). When a cutpoint of BI-RADS 3 was used, the sensitivity across all readers was 57.5% for FFDM alone and 74.1% for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant increase in sensitivity (p < 0.001) (relative increase = 29%). Overall specificity was 78.1% for FFDM alone and 76.1% for FFDM with ABUS (p = 0.496). For only the mammography-negative cancers, the average AUC was 0.60 for FFDM alone and 0.75 for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 25% relative improvement in AUC with the addition of ABUS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Combining mammography with ABUS, compared with mammography alone, significantly improved readers' detection of breast cancers in women with dense breast tissue without substantially affecting specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1350
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Copit, Debra Somers
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Miller, Dave P.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (16): : 1784 - 1786
  • [22] Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk
    Glechner, Anna
    Wagner, Gernot
    Mitus, Jerzy W.
    Teufer, Birgit
    Klerings, Irma
    Bock, Nina
    Grillich, Ludwig
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (03):
  • [23] Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Thaler, Kylie
    Chapman, Andrea
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler, Angela
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Van Noord, Megan G.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):
  • [24] Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography
    Girardi, Veronica
    Tonegutti, Mara
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonetti, Franco
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (05) : 806 - 809
  • [25] The Addition of Automated Breast Ultrasound to Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening Decreases Stage at Diagnosis
    Grady, Ian
    Chanisheva, Nailya
    Vasquez, Tony
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 1570 - 1574
  • [26] Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts
    Yamashita, Mary W.
    Larsen, Linda H.
    Perez, Jeremiah
    Edwards, Alexandra, V
    Papaioannou, John
    Jiang, Yulei
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 311 (03)
  • [27] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for screening women with dense breasts
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2016, 13 (06) : 515 - 517
  • [28] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts
    Sorin, Vera
    Yagil, Yael
    Yosepovich, Ady
    Shalmon, Anat
    Gotlieb, Michael
    Neiman, Osnat Halshtok
    Sklair-Levy, Miri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (05) : W267 - W274
  • [29] Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening
    Lee, Janie M.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    Liao, Geraldine J.
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Kim, Adrienne E.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Rahbar, Habib
    Scheel, John R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 55 : 119 - 125
  • [30] Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
    Nissan, Noam
    Comstock, Christopher E.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Gluskin, Jill
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Hughes, Mary
    Ochoa-Albiztegui, R. Elena
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 313 (01)