(In) visibility: accounts of embodiment of women with physical disabilities and differences

被引:64
作者
Zitzelsberger, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
embodiment; gender; identity; invisibility; qualitative research; sexuality; sociology of disability; visibility;
D O I
10.1080/09687590500086492
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This qualitative study explored relationships between contemporary western cultural representations of bodies and the experiences of women born with physical disabilities and differences. In multiple, in-depth interviews, 14 women described the ways their embodiments are shaped by cultural discourses of disability, difference and gender. The findings indicated myriad ways in which the participating women experienced their embodied selves, paradoxically as both invisible and visible across sociomaterial places. Given the narrow range of normative appearances and capacities of 'acceptable' bodies, the women's bodies were frequently seen as undesirable whereas their subjectivities and lives were rendered invisible. The women articulated accounts of imposed ways of being seen by others and how these views structured and delimited their agency and resistances. This article highlights the fluid and multiple ways embodiment is produced, seen and experienced, and the importance of taking into account the interplay of gender with experiences of physical disability and difference.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 403
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DISABILITY STUDIES R
[2]  
[Anonymous], FEMINIST REV
[3]  
ASCH A, 1992, DISRUPTIVE VOICES PO, P139
[4]  
Barnes Colin., 1999, EXPLORING DISABILITY
[5]  
Brook Barbara, 1999, Feminist Perspectives on the Body
[6]   DISCOVERING CHRONIC ILLNESS - USING GROUNDED THEORY [J].
CHARMAZ, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 30 (11) :1161-1172
[7]  
Charmaz K., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P509, DOI DOI 10.1177/0891241609342193
[8]  
Charmaz K., 2002, The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, P675, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781452218403.N25, 10.4135/9781412973588.n39]
[9]   Differences, conflations and foundations: the limits to 'accurate' theoretical representation of disabled people's experience? [J].
Corker, M .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 1999, 14 (05) :627-642
[10]  
Corker M., 1999, DISABILITY DISCOURSE